Literature DB >> 15814017

Validity of process indicators of screening for breast cancer to predict mortality reduction.

T Sarkeala1, A Anttila, I Saarenmaa, M Hakama.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to empirically assess the acceptable levels of process indicators as described in the European Community Guidelines using materials from the mammography service screening programmes. The Finnish programme was evaluated for effectiveness with a prior estimate of 0.74 for RR in Finland and 0.81 in Helsinki. Hence, the Finnish programme was likely to be somewhat less effective in terms of reduction in mortality than implied on the basis of early randomized trials, but probably approaching the same level of effectiveness. Finland therefore provides background data on the applicability of the process indicators that are indicators of performance and surrogates for effectiveness. The performance data on 10 Finnish screening centres at subsequent screens were used. These centres invited 687,000 women aged 50-64 years in 1991-2000. The mean compliance was 93% and the corresponding recall rate was 2.3%. The benign to malignant biopsy ratio was 0.43:1. The average breast cancer detection rate was 0.36%, 2.1 compared with the background incidence. The proportion of screen-detected stage II+ cancers was 26%. Most, but not all, of these process indicators met the desirable reference values of the European Community. The specific criteria of the European Community on stage distribution, rates of screen-detected cancers by stage and detection rate to background incidence may need reconsideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15814017     DOI: 10.1258/0969141053279112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  3 in total

1.  Using the European guidelines to evaluate the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Berta Geller; Pamela M Vacek; Steinar Thoresen; Per Skaane
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  What should the detection rates of cancers be in breast screening programmes?

Authors:  S W Duffy; R Gabe
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators.

Authors:  Sergei Muratov; Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Jean-Eric Tarride; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Nadya Dimitrova; Bettina Borisch; Xavier Castells; Stephen W Duffy; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Markus Follmann; Livia Giordano; Solveig Hofvind; Annette Lebeau; Cecily Quinn; Alberto Torresin; Claudia Vialli; Sabine Siesling; Antonio Ponti; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Holger Schünemann; Lennarth Nyström; Mireille Broeders
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.