Literature DB >> 17593312

Indications for predismissal testing with arrhythmia-induction in patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

G Christ1, R Becker, F Voss, K Kelemen, J Senges-Becker, M Hauck, W Schoels, I Bald, H A Katus, A Bauer.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Arrhythmia induction during implantation of cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) is a standard procedure. However, controversy exists regarding the need for routine arrhythmia induction before discharge from hospital (pre-hospital discharge (PHD) test). In order to reduce the number of tests we identified risk factors that predict relevant ICD malfunction. METHODS AND
RESULTS: 965 patients receiving a first device implantation (n=724) or device/system replacement (n=241) between 1998 and 2004 were analysed. During implantation 176 (18%) complications (intraoperative undersensing of induced arrhythmias, unsuccessful arrhythmia-therapy or low DFT safety margin) occurred. Frequent (>4 times) intraoperative lead repositioning due to low sensing values was present in 44 patients (5%). 9% of the patients with first ICD implantation, 21% with device replacement and 27% with system replacement developed complications during PHD testing with arrhythmia induction. Intraoperative complications, although corrected during implantation, were independent risk factors for malfunction during PHD testing (p<0.05). Additional predictors for malfunction were intraoperative lead repositioning (>4 times) and a history of both VF and VT (p<0.05). Patients without intraoperative complications rarely developed malfunction during PHD testing (3.7% first device, 6.25% system replacement). Only in patients undergoing device replacement was a higher risk for failure (13%) evident. No risk factors could be identified for these subgroups.
CONCLUSION: Routine arrhythmia induction during PHD is recommended in ICD patients with intraoperative complications, although corrected during implantation, as well as frequent intraoperatives lead repositioning. Patients undergoing device/system replacement uncomplicated implantation are not generally at low risk for device failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17593312     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-007-0541-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  17 in total

Review 1.  Routine arrhythmia inductions for ICD follow-up: are they obsolete?

Authors:  M Glikson; P Friedman
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Clinical value of routine predischarge testing after ICD-implantation.

Authors:  Axel Buob; Stephanos Siaplaouras; Dietmar Tscholl; Hans-Joachim Schäfers; Michael Böhm; Jens Jung
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  On the necessity of the invasive predischarge test after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  A Wieckhorst; A Buchwald; C Unterberg
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; David J Wilber; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; Steven L Higgins; Mary W Brown; Mark L Andrews
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Cognitive dysfunction after ventricular fibrillation during implantable cardiovertor/defibrillator procedures is related to duration of the reperfusion interval.

Authors:  J M Murkin; D L Baird; J S Martzke; R Yee
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Gust H Bardy; Kerry L Lee; Daniel B Mark; Jeanne E Poole; Douglas L Packer; Robin Boineau; Michael Domanski; Charles Troutman; Jill Anderson; George Johnson; Steven E McNulty; Nancy Clapp-Channing; Linda D Davidson-Ray; Elizabeth S Fraulo; Daniel P Fishbein; Richard M Luceri; John H Ip
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators.

Authors:  A J Moss; W J Hall; D S Cannom; J P Daubert; S L Higgins; H Klein; J H Levine; S Saksena; A L Waldo; D Wilber; M W Brown; M Heo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Cardiac output is not affected during intraoperative testing of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  J Meyer; T Möllhoff; T Seifert; J Brunn; J Rötker; M Block; T Prien
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-03

9.  ICD restudy: results and potential benefit from routine predischarge and 2-month evaluation.

Authors:  S L Higgins; D H Rich; J R Haygood; J Barone; S L Greer; D B Meyer
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Efficacy of low-energy T wave shocks for induction of ventricular fibrillation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  A K Bhandari; N Isber; M Estioko; T Ziccardi; D S Cannom; Y Park; R D Lerman; C Prejean; G W Sun
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.438

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia in a patient with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Oliver Adam; Christian Ukena; Michael Böhm; Hans-Ruprecht Neuberger
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Shock or no shock - a question of philosophy or should intraoperative implantable cardioverter defibrillator testing be recommended?

Authors:  Andreas Keyser; Michael K Hilker; Sebastian Schmidt; Christian von Bary; Wolfgang Zink; Michael Ried; Christof Schmid; Claudius Diez
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-07

3.  ICD implantation without intraoperative testing does not increase the rate of system modifications and does not impair defibrillation efficacy tested in follow-up.

Authors:  Dirk Bastian; Stefan Kracker; Matthias Pauschinger; Konrad Göhl
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-06-07

4.  How to Manage a High Defibrillation Threshold in ICD Patients: and Does it Really Matter?

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Matassini; Jeff S Healey
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-08

5.  Intra-operative defibrillation testing and clinical shock efficacy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: the NORDIC ICD randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Dietmar Bänsch; Hendrik Bonnemeier; Johan Brandt; Frank Bode; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Miloš Táborský; Stefan Kuster; Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; Angelika Felk; Tino Hauser; Anna Suling; Karl Wegscheider
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 29.983

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.