Literature DB >> 17581709

Influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for detection of diffuse pulmonary disease on chest radiographs.

Hiromichi Fukushima1, Mitsuru Ikeda, Takeo Ishigaki, Hisashi Usami, Kazuhiro Shimamoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary diseases depicted on chest radiographs by comparing them with a high-resolution cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of 17 radiologists interpreted 87 soft-copy images on LCD monitors with pixel arrays of 1024 x 1280, 1200 x 1600, 1536 x 2048, and 2048 x 2560 and on a CRT monitor with a pixel array of 2048 x 2560. They were asked to indicate their individual confidence levels regarding the presence of diffuse pulmonary diseases. The luminance distributions of all monitors were adjusted to the same distributions, and the ambient illumination was 200 lux. Observer performance was analyzed in terms of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC).
RESULTS: The average ROC curves for the five monitor types were similar, and there were no statistically reliable effects of the five monitor types on the readers' diagnostic performances (P = 0.7587).
CONCLUSION: The detectability of diffuse pulmonary disease on the LCD monitors with a spatial resolution equal to or higher than a matrix size of 1024 x 1280 was found to be equivalent to that on the high-resolution CRT monitor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17581709     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-007-0126-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Med        ISSN: 0288-2043


  21 in total

1.  Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems.

Authors:  A Y Kim; K S Cho; K S Song; J H Kim; J G Kim; H K Ha
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: general guidelines for purchasing and acceptance testing of PACS equipment.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; J Anthony Seibert; Katherine Andriole; Aldo Badano; Jay Crawford; Bruce Reiner; Michael J Flynn; Paul Chang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum; C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 4.  Importance and effects of altered workplace ergonomics in modern radiology suites.

Authors:  Mukesh G Harisinghani; Michael A Blake; Mansi Saksena; Peter F Hahn; Debra Gervais; Michael Zalis; Leonor da Silva Dias Fernandes; Peter R Mueller
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study.

Authors:  Csilla Balassy; Mathias Prokop; Michael Weber; Johannes Sailer; Christian J Herold; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data.

Authors:  C E Metz; B A Herman; J H Shen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Glenohumeral relationships during physiologic shoulder motion and stress testing: initial experience with open MR imaging and active imaging-plane registration.

Authors:  C F Beaulieu; D K Hodge; A G Bergman; K Butts; B L Daniel; C L Napper; R D Darrow; C L Dumoulin; R J Herfkens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors.

Authors:  Martina Scharitzer; Mathias Prokop; Michael Weber; Michael Fuchsjäger; Elisabeth Oschatz; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  SCAR R&D Symposium 2003: comparing the efficacy of 5-MP CRT versus 3-MP LCD in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Steve Langer; Brian Bartholmai; Ken Fetterly; Scott Harmsen; William Ryan; Brad Erickson; Kathy Andriole; John Carrino
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Liquid-crystal display monitors and cathode-ray tube monitors: a comparison of observer performance in the detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Soon-A Hwang; Joon Beom Seo; Byeong-Kyoo Choi; Kyung-Hyun Do; Sung Min Ko; Soo-Hyun Lee; Jin-Seong Lee; Jae-Woo Song; Koun-Sik Song; Tae-Hwan Lim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of greyscale liquid crystal displays of different resolutions on observer performance during detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  J Yin; Q Guo; W Zhang; H Su; J Zhang; Y Yue; C Ding; A Lin; Y Wang; H Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Soft-copy display and reading: what the radiologist should know in the digital era.

Authors:  Erich Sorantin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-06-12

3.  Technical and radiological image quality comparison of different liquid crystal displays for radiology.

Authors:  Francina Em Dams; K Y Esther Leung; Pieter Hm van der Valk; Marc Cjm Kock; Jeroen Bosman; Sjoerd P Niehof
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-10-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.