Literature DB >> 18548242

Soft-copy display and reading: what the radiologist should know in the digital era.

Erich Sorantin1.   

Abstract

The basic scheme of modern medical imaging consists of the following steps: (1) data acquisition, (2) data (image) processing, (3) further data processing by the computer graphic system, (4) image display, and finally (5) visual perception and interpretation. Medical monitors represent a forgotten part of the whole chain. The purpose of this review is to present the key facts about the display technologies used today, as well as their characterization and quality assurance.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18548242     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-008-0898-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  12 in total

1.  Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: initial results for clinical PACS displays.

Authors:  D S Groth; S N Bernatz; K A Fetterly; N J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesions.

Authors:  Elisabeth Oschatz; Mathias Prokop; Martina Scharitzer; Michael Weber; Csilla Balassy; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study.

Authors:  Csilla Balassy; Mathias Prokop; Michael Weber; Johannes Sailer; Christian J Herold; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs.

Authors:  H Usami; M Ikeda; T Ishigaki; H Fukushima; K Shimamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Aldo Badano; Dev Chakraborty; Ken Compton; Craig Cornelius; Kevin Corrigan; Michael J Flynn; Bradley Hemminger; Nick Hangiandreou; Jeffrey Johnson; Donna M Moxley-Stevens; William Pavlicek; Hans Roehrig; Lois Rutz; Jeffrey Shepard; Robert A Uzenoff; Jihong Wang; Charles E Willis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Assessment of PACS display systems.

Authors:  John E Aldrich; John D Rutledge
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Digital radiography.Results of a survey (part A) and a consensus conference (part B)

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  [Computer-assisted mechanical ventilation of newborn infants].

Authors:  E Sorantin; H Coradello; M Wiltgen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors.

Authors:  Martina Scharitzer; Mathias Prokop; Michael Weber; Michael Fuchsjäger; Elisabeth Oschatz; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for detection of diffuse pulmonary disease on chest radiographs.

Authors:  Hiromichi Fukushima; Mitsuru Ikeda; Takeo Ishigaki; Hisashi Usami; Kazuhiro Shimamoto
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-06-27
View more
  3 in total

1.  Platforms for tele-reading: history and lessons learned by the World Federation of Pediatric Imaging.

Authors:  Erich Sorantin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-05-23

Review 2.  The augmented radiologist: artificial intelligence in the practice of radiology.

Authors:  Erich Sorantin; Michael G Grasser; Ariane Hemmelmayr; Sebastian Tschauner; Franko Hrzic; Veronika Weiss; Jana Lacekova; Andreas Holzinger
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-10-19

3.  Impact of viewing conditions on the performance assessment of different computer monitors used for dental diagnostics.

Authors:  Thomas Hastie; Sascha Venske-Parker; Johan K M Aps
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-02-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.