Literature DB >> 12692684

Clinical outcome and periprosthetic bone remodelling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design.

Rainer Schmidt1, Lutz Mueller, Tobias E Nowak, Rocco P Pitto.   

Abstract

We followed 48 consecutive patients (50 hips) with osteoarthritis who received a primary total hip replacement using a tapered stem with hydroxylapatite coating (Cerafit Multicone H-A.C.) and a press-fit cup. Mean follow-up was 3 years, mean patient age was 54.7 years, and mean preoperative Harris hip score was 57. Quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodelling was assessed 1 year after the index operation using computed tomography (CT). Clinical and radiological follow-up was obtained in all hips. The mean Harris hip score at follow-up was 96. Forty-nine hips were clinically rated good or excellent. No thigh pain was reported. Radiographs showed stable fixation by bone ingrowth in all hips. Fifteen hips were eligible for CT. Three years after operation, mean decrease of overall bone mineral density (BMD) was 14.2% and mean decrease of cortical BMD 15.5% in the metaphyseal portion. In the diaphyseal portion, mean decrease of overall BMD was 10.0% and mean decrease of cortical BMD 7.7%. Minimal changes were observed at the level of the tip of the stem. Clinical and radiological outcome using a tapered femoral stem with hydroxylapatite coating compares favourably with other reports. Osteodensitometry shows limited proximal femoral bone resorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12692684      PMCID: PMC3458479          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-003-0455-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling.

Authors:  L Rosenthall; J D Bobyn; M Tanzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented femoral component with taper design: outcome at 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  M Schramm; F Keck; D Hohmann; R P Pitto
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Engh; T F McGovern; J D Bobyn; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Radiolucent lines: a question of nomenclature.

Authors:  M A Freeman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The contributions and limitations of hydroxyapatite coatings to implant fixation: A histomorphometric study of load bearing implants in dogs.

Authors:  E Munting
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Cementless primary total hip replacement. Four to eight year results with the Zweymüller-Alloclassic prosthesis.

Authors:  C Delaunay; C Cazeau; A I Kapandji
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur.

Authors:  L D Dorr; M C Faugere; A M Mackel; T A Gruen; B Bognar; H H Malluche
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  The Otto Aufranc Award. Skeletal response to well fixed femoral components inserted with and without cement.

Authors:  W J Maloney; C Sychterz; C Bragdon; T McGovern; M Jasty; C A Engh; W H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  J S Xenos; J J Callaghan; R D Heekin; W J Hopkinson; C G Savory; M S Moore
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A critical look at cementless stems. Taper designs and when to use alternatives.

Authors:  R B Bourne; C H Rorabeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Changes of bone mineral density after cementless total hip arthroplasty with two different stems.

Authors:  Keiji Sano; Kouji Ito; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Quantitative computer-assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Pitto; L A Mueller; K Reilly; R Schmidt; J Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Aknaksha Bhargava; Salil Pandit; Cameron Walker; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Osteodensitometry after total hip replacement with uncemented taper-design stem.

Authors:  Rainer Schmidt; Tobias E Nowak; Lutz Mueller; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Minimal stress shielding with a Mallory-Head titanium femoral stem with proximal porous coating in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brad Ellison; Nicholas A Cheney; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Thomas H Mallory
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.