Literature DB >> 17574974

Frequent diagnostic errors in cardiac PET/CT due to misregistration of CT attenuation and emission PET images: a definitive analysis of causes, consequences, and corrections.

K Lance Gould1, Tinsu Pan, Catalin Loghin, Nils P Johnson, Ashrith Guha, Stefano Sdringola.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Cardiac PET combined with CT is rapidly expanding despite artifactual defects and false-positive results due to misregistration of PET and CT attenuation correction data-the frequency, cause, and correction of which remain undetermined.
METHODS: Two hundred fifty-nine consecutive patients underwent diagnostic rest-dipyridamole myocardial perfusion PET/CT using (82)Rb, a 16-slice PET/CT scanner, helical CT attenuation correction with breathing and also at end-expiratory breath-hold, and averaged cine CT data during breathing. Misregistration on superimposed PET/CT fusion images was objectively measured in millimeters and correlated with associated quantitative size and severity of PET defects. Misregistration artifacts were defined as PET defects with corresponding misregistration on helical CT-PET fusion images that resolved after correct coregistration using a repeat CT scan, cine CT averaged attenuation during normal breathing, or shifted cine CT data that coregistered with PET data.
RESULTS: Misregistration of standard helical CT PET images caused artifactual PET defects in 103 of 259 (40%) patients that were moderate to severe in 59 (23%) (P = 0.0000) and quantitatively normalized on cine or shifted cine CT PET (P = 0.0000). Quantitative misregistration was a powerful predictor of artifact size and severity (P = 0.0000), particularly for transaxial misregistration >6 mm occurring in anterior or lateral areas in 76%, in inferior areas in 16%, and at the apex in 8% of 103 artifactual defects.
CONCLUSION: Misregistration of helical CT attenuation and PET emission images causes artifactual defects with false-positive results in 40% of patients that normalize on cine CT PET using averaged CT attenuation data during normal breathing comparable to normal breathing during PET emission scanning and shifting cine CT images to coregister visually with PET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17574974     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.039792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  93 in total

1.  Quantitative Nuclear Cardiology: we are almost there!

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality?

Authors:  Antti Saraste; Sami Kajander; Chunlei Han; Sergey V Nesterov; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Attenuation-emission alignment in cardiac PET/CT based on consistency conditions.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan; Kyle M Champley; James H Caldwell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Is metal artefact reduction mandatory in cardiac PET/CT imaging in the presence of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads?

Authors:  Pardis Ghafarian; S M R Aghamiri; Mohammad R Ay; Arman Rahmim; Thomas H Schindler; Osman Ratib; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve: Technical aspects.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Quantitative Coronary Physiology for Clinical Management: the Imaging Standard.

Authors:  K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Simultaneous reconstruction of attenuation and activity in cardiac PET can remove CT misalignment artifacts.

Authors:  L Presotto; E Busnardo; D Perani; L Gianolli; M C Gilardi; V Bettinardi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Partial volume correction incorporating Rb-82 positron range for quantitative myocardial perfusion PET based on systolic-diastolic activity ratios and phantom measurements.

Authors:  Nils P Johnson; Stefano Sdringola; K Lance Gould
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Importance of correct patient positioning in myocardial perfusion SPECT when using a CZT camera.

Authors:  Cecilia Hindorf; Jenny Oddstig; Fredrik Hedeer; Magnus J Hansson; Jonas Jögi; Henrik Engblom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.