Literature DB >> 1757290

Recovery from prior stimulation. II: Effects upon intensity discrimination.

F G Zeng1, C W Turner, E M Relkin.   

Abstract

We obtained just-noticeable differences (jnds) for the intensity of pure tones following a forward masker. The masker was a 100-ms burst of narrow-band noise centered at 1000 Hz presented at 90 dB SPL; the pure-tone signal was at 1000 Hz and was 25 ms in duration. The masker-signal delay was 100 ms. Under these conditions, there is no threshold shift for the detection of the pure-tone signal following the forward masker. In contrast with the absence of a forward-masker effect upon detection thresholds, unusually large midlevel (40-60 dB SPL) jnds were observed. These large midlevel jnds were measured as a function of signal delay, revealing that they are not completely recovered to the normal (unmasked) values by 400 ms. We interpret these data as a consequence of the slower recovery of low-spontaneous rate, high-threshold neurons following prior stimulation (Relkin and Doucet, 1990). These experiments may therefore provide psychophysical evidence that the low-spontaneous rate, high-threshold neurons are a necessary physiological component in the coding of the large dynamic range for intensity. In addition, the present data provide evidence that the assumption that the effect of forward masking is limited to 100-200 ms is inappropriate, as this recovery time does not necessarily apply to suprathreshold tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1757290     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(91)90107-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  17 in total

1.  Efferent synapses return to inner hair cells in the aging cochlea.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Paul A Fuchs; David K Ryugo; Howard W Francis
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Level-tuned neurons in primary auditory cortex adapt differently to loud versus soft sounds.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  No longer falling on deaf ears: mechanisms of degeneration and regeneration of cochlear ribbon synapses.

Authors:  Guoqiang Wan; Gabriel Corfas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Exploring the source of the mid-level hump for intensity discrimination in quiet and the effects of noise.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Notched-noise precursors improve detection of low-frequency amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Ali Almishaal; Gavin M Bidelman; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Intensity-invariant coding in the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Optimizing non-invasive functional markers for cochlear deafferentation based on electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  The impact of preceding noise on the frequency tuning of rat auditory cortex neurons.

Authors:  Yinting Peng; Pengpeng Xing; Juan He; Xinde Sun; Jiping Zhang
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Patricia Stahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.