Literature DB >> 25786945

Exploring the source of the mid-level hump for intensity discrimination in quiet and the effects of noise.

Elin Roverud1, Elizabeth A Strickland1.   

Abstract

Intensity discrimination Weber fractions (WFs) measured for short, high-frequency tones in quiet are larger at mid levels than at lower or higher levels. The source of this "mid-level hump" is a matter of debate. One theory is that the mid-level hump reflects basilar-membrane compression, and that WFs decrease at higher levels due to spread-of-excitation cues. To test this theory, Experiment 1 measured the mid-level hump and growth-of-masking functions to estimate the basilar membrane input/output (I/O) function in the same listeners. Results showed the initial rise in WFs could be accounted for by the change in I/O function slope, but there was additional unexplained variability in WFs. Previously, Plack [(1998). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103(5), 2530-2538] showed that long-duration notched noise (NN) presented with the tone reduced the mid-level hump even with a temporal gap in the NN. Plack concluded the results were consistent with central profile analysis. However, simultaneous, forward, and backward NN were not examined separately, which may independently test peripheral and central mechanisms of the NN. Experiment 2 measured WFs at the mid-level hump in the presence of NN and narrowband noise of different durations and temporal positions relative to the tone. Results varied across subjects, but were consistent with more peripheral mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25786945      PMCID: PMC4368585          DOI: 10.1121/1.4908243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  57 in total

1.  Forward masking: adaptation or integration?

Authors:  A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Rate and timing cues associated with the cochlear amplifier: level discrimination based on monaural cross-frequency coincidence detection.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The intensity-difference limen for Gaussian-enveloped stimuli as a function of level: tones and broadband noise.

Authors:  L Nizami; J F Reimer; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Psychophysical suppression measured with bandlimited noise extended below and/or above the signal: effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  J R Dubno; J B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The relationship between frequency selectivity and overshoot.

Authors:  E A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.

Authors:  John J Guinan; Bradford C Backus; Watjana Lilaonitkul; Vered Aharonson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-13

7.  A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D A Nelson; A C Schroder; M Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans.

Authors:  D O Kim; P A Dorn; S T Neely; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-03

9.  Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Vit Drga; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The temporal effect with notched-noise maskers: analysis in terms of input-output functions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  The effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral broadband noise on the mid-level hump in intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Alix M Klang; Nathan T Torunsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-28

3.  Notched-noise precursors improve detection of low-frequency amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Ali Almishaal; Gavin M Bidelman; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Influence of suppression on restoration of spectral loudness summation in listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Robin R High; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Amplitude modulation detection with a short-duration carrier: Effects of a precursor and hearing loss.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jessica Chen; Sara E Fultz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.974

7.  Object-based attention modulates the discrimination of level increments in stop-consonant noise bursts.

Authors:  Blas Espinoza-Varas; Jeremiah Hilton; Shaoxuan Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  PsyAcoustX: A flexible MATLAB(®) package for psychoacoustics research.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.