Literature DB >> 19651958

Far cortical locking can reduce stiffness of locked plating constructs while retaining construct strength.

Michael Bottlang1, Josef Doornink, Daniel C Fitzpatrick, Steven M Madey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several strategies to reduce construct stiffness have been proposed to promote secondary bone healing following fracture fixation with locked bridge plating constructs. However, stiffness reduction is typically gained at the cost of construct strength. In the present study, we tested whether a novel strategy for stiffness reduction, termed far cortical locking, can significantly reduce the stiffness of a locked plating construct while retaining its strength.
METHODS: Locked plating constructs and far cortical locking constructs were tested in a diaphyseal bridge plating model of the non-osteoporotic femoral diaphysis to determine construct stiffness in axial compression, torsion, and bending. Subsequently, constructs were dynamically loaded until failure in each loading mode to determine construct strength and failure modes. Finally, failure tests were repeated in a validated model of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis to determine construct strength and failure modes in a worst-case scenario of bridge plating in osteoporotic bone.
RESULTS: Compared with the locked plating constructs, the initial stiffness of far cortical locking constructs was 88% lower in axial compression (p < 0.001), 58% lower in torsion (p < 0.001), and 29% lower in bending (p < 0.001). Compared with the locked plating constructs, the strength of far cortical locking constructs was 7% lower (p = 0.005) and 16% lower (p < 0.001) under axial compression in the non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic diaphysis, respectively. However, far cortical locking constructs were 54% stronger (p < 0.001) and 9% stronger (p = 0.04) under torsion and 21% stronger (p < 0.001) and 20% stronger (p = 0.02) under bending than locked plating constructs in the non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic diaphysis, respectively. Within the initial stiffness range, far cortical locking constructs generated nearly parallel interfragmentary motion. Locked plating constructs generated significantly less motion at the near cortex adjacent to the plate than at the far cortex (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Far cortical locking significantly reduces the axial stiffness of a locked plating construct. This gain in flexibility causes only a modest reduction in axial strength and increased torsional and bending strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651958      PMCID: PMC2714811          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  52 in total

1.  Backgrounds of the technology of internal fixators.

Authors:  Stephan M Perren
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Axial movement and tibial fractures. A controlled randomised trial of treatment.

Authors:  J Kenwright; J B Richardson; J L Cunningham; S H White; A E Goodship; M A Adams; P A Magnussen; J H Newman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-07

3.  The influence of active shear or compressive motion on fracture-healing.

Authors:  S H Park; K O'Connor; H McKellop; A Sarmiento
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  A comparative biomechanical evaluation of a noncontacting plate and currently used devices for tibial fixation.

Authors:  M J Kowalski; E H Schemitsch; R M Harrington; J R Chapman; M F Swiontkowski
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1996-01

5.  Interfragmentary motion in tibial osteotomies stabilized with ring fixators.

Authors:  Georg N Duda; Michael Sollmann; Simon Sporrer; Jan E Hoffmann; Jean-Pierre Kassi; Cyrus Khodadadyan; Michael Raschke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?

Authors:  M Ahmad; R Nanda; A S Bajwa; J Candal-Couto; S Green; A C Hui
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 7.  Biomechanics of locked plates and screws.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Erik N Kubiak; Eric Fulkerson; Frederick J Kummer; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Complications of plate fixation of forearm fractures.

Authors:  P J Stern; W J Drury
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures.

Authors:  A E Goodship; J Kenwright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1985-08

10.  Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Ulrich Dieter; Gwidon Stachowiak; André Gächter; Markus S Kuster
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  43 in total

1.  Effects of construct stiffness on healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Josef Doornink; Trevor J Lujan; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; J Lawrence Marsh; Peter Augat; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Maren Lesser; Steven M Madey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Minimally invasive surgery with locking plate for periprosthetic femoral fractures: technical note.

Authors:  Matthieu Ehlinger; Benjamin Scheibling; Michel Rahme; David Brinkert; Benoit Schenck; Antonio Di Marco; Philippe Adam; François Bonnomet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Stabilization of distal femur fractures with intramedullary nails and locking plates: differences in callus formation.

Authors:  Christopher E Henderson; Trevor Lujan; Michael Bottlang; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Steve M Madey; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

4.  The dynamic locking screw (DLS) can increase interfragmentary motion on the near cortex of locked plating constructs by reducing the axial stiffness.

Authors:  Stefan Döbele; Carsten Horn; Stefan Eichhorn; Arne Buchholtz; Andreas Lenich; Rainer Burgkart; Andreas K Nüssler; Martin Lucke; Daniel Andermatt; Rudolf Koch; Ulrich Stöckle
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Far cortical locking can improve healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Maren Lesser; Julia Koerber; Josef Doornink; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Peter Augat; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Steven M Madey; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  From Bench to Bedside: How Stiff is Too Stiff? Far-cortical Locking or Dynamic Locked Plating May Obviate the Question.

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Dynamic locking screw improves fixation strength in osteoporotic bone: an in vitro study on an artificial bone model.

Authors:  Tim Pohlemann; Boyko Gueorguiev; Yash Agarwal; Dieter Wahl; Christoph Sprecher; Karsten Schwieger; Mark Lenz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Dynamic Stabilization with Active Locking Plates Delivers Faster, Stronger, and More Symmetric Fracture-Healing.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Stanley Tsai; Emily K Bliven; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Karina Klein; Peter Augat; Julia Henschel; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Steven M Madey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Dynamic Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures Using Active Locking Plates: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Steven M Madey; Stanley Tsai; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Kathleen Earley; Michael Lutsch; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

10.  Plating of metacarpal fractures with locked or nonlocked screws, a biomechanical study: how many cortices are really necessary?

Authors:  Cameron Barr; Anthony W Behn; Jeffrey Yao
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.