Literature DB >> 17558338

Histologic changes in the breast with menopausal hormone therapy use: correlation with breast density, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and proliferation indices.

Jennifer A Harvey1, Richard J Santen, Gina R Petroni, Viktor E Bovbjerg, Mark E Smolkin, Fathima S Sheriff, Jose Russo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study systematically compared mammographic density with histology in women receiving or not receiving menopausal hormone therapy (HT).
DESIGN: This study was approved by the institutional review board. Twenty-eight postmenopausal women using HT were matched with 28 postmenopausal women not using HT at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. Noncancerous tissue from mastectomy specimens was examined histologically to quantitate the content of fibrous stroma, ducts, and lobule types 1, 2, and 3. Tissue samples were also evaluated for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Ki67 activity in the ducts and lobules. Breast density was quantified by digitizing the contralateral mammogram and computer-assisted interactive thresholding.
RESULTS: High breast density in women using HT was correlated with greater fibrous stroma (P = 0.020) and lobule type 1 (P = 0.016). Breast density also correlated with Ki67 activity in the ducts (P = 0.031) and lobules (P= 0.023) for both groups combined. Estrogen and progesterone receptors did not correlate with either breast density or HT use.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased fibrous stroma and lobule type 1 are associated with increasing mammographic density in women using HT, independent of estrogen and progesterone receptor up-regulation. These findings suggest that increased breast density may be mediated through a paracrine effect. The increase in breast cancer risk with HT use may be due to an increase in target lobule type 1 cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17558338      PMCID: PMC4567838          DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318054e29a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Menopause        ISSN: 1072-3714            Impact factor:   2.953


  37 in total

Review 1.  Estrogen responsiveness and control of normal human breast proliferation.

Authors:  E Anderson; R B Clarke; A Howell
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Viktor E Bovbjerg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Comparative study of human and rat mammary tumorigenesis.

Authors:  J Russo; B A Gusterson; A E Rogers; I H Russo; S R Wellings; M J van Zwieten
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.662

4.  Factors associated with age at natural menopause in a multiethnic sample of midlife women.

Authors:  E B Gold; J Bromberger; S Crawford; S Samuels; G A Greendale; S D Harlow; J Skurnick
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  N F Boyd; G A Lockwood; J W Byng; D L Tritchler; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Pattern of distribution of cells positive for estrogen receptor alpha and progesterone receptor in relation to proliferating cells in the mammary gland.

Authors:  J Russo; X Ao; C Grill; I H Russo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Digitized mammography: a clinical trial of postmenopausal women randomly assigned to receive raloxifene, estrogen, or placebo.

Authors:  M Freedman; J San Martin; J O'Gorman; S Eckert; M E Lippman; S C Lo; E L Walls; J Zeng
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-01-03       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Effects of conjugated equine estrogens on breast cancer and mammography screening in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy.

Authors:  Marcia L Stefanick; Garnet L Anderson; Karen L Margolis; Susan L Hendrix; Rebecca J Rodabough; Electra D Paskett; Dorothy S Lane; F Allan Hubbell; Annlouise R Assaf; Gloria E Sarto; Robert S Schenken; Shagufta Yasmeen; Lawrence Lessin; Rowan T Chlebowski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Comparison of the effect of raloxifene and continuous-combined hormone therapy on mammographic breast density and breast tenderness in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Valerie P Jackson; Javier A San Martin; Roberta J Secrest; Michelle McNabb; Sebastian Carranza-Lira; Pedro Figueroa-Casas; César E Fernandes; Josefina Romaguera
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Effects of estrogen and estrogen-progestin on mammographic parenchymal density. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Investigators.

Authors:  G A Greendale; B A Reboussin; A Sie; H R Singh; L K Olson; O Gatewood; L W Bassett; C Wasilauskas; T Bush; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  19 in total

1.  Aromatase immunoreactivity is increased in mammographically dense regions of the breast.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Hironobu Sasano; Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; David A Watson; Carol Reynolds; Wilma L Lingle; Paul E Goss; Rong Li; Sarah E Aiyar; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Richard J Santen; James N Ingle
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  The Susan G. Komen for the Cure Tissue Bank at the IU Simon Cancer Center: a unique resource for defining the "molecular histology" of the breast.

Authors:  Mark E Sherman; Jonine D Figueroa; Jill E Henry; Susan E Clare; Connie Rufenbarger; Anna Maria Storniolo
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-02-17

3.  Stiff stroma increases breast cancer risk by inducing the oncogene ZNF217.

Authors:  Jason J Northey; Alexander S Barrett; Irene Acerbi; Mary-Kate Hayward; Stephanie Talamantes; Ivory S Dean; Janna K Mouw; Suzanne M Ponik; Jonathon N Lakins; Po-Jui Huang; Junmin Wu; Quanming Shi; Susan Samson; Patricia J Keely; Rita A Mukhtar; Jan T Liphardt; John A Shepherd; E Shelley Hwang; Yunn-Yi Chen; Kirk C Hansen; Laurie E Littlepage; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Diane L Nathan; Yan Wang; Yuanjie Zheng; James C Gee; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Tissue composition of mammographically dense and non-dense breast tissue.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; Carol Reynolds; Christopher G Scott; V S Pankratz; Darren L Riehle; Wilma L Lingle; Tonye Odogwu; Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; James N Ingle; Lynn C Hartmann; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Lonie R Salkowski; Patricia J Keely; Timothy J Hall; Walter F Block; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-22

7.  Diffusion tensor imaging in the normal breast: influences of fibroglandular tissue composition and background parenchymal enhancement.

Authors:  Michael Jonathan Plaza; Elizabeth A Morris; Sunitha B Thakur
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.605

8.  The impact of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue.

Authors:  E R Price; J D Brooks; E J Watson; S B Brennan; E A Comen; E A Morris
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Mammographic breast density response to aromatase inhibition.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Vera J Suman; Kathleen R Brandt; Matthew L Kosel; Aman U Buzdar; Janet E Olson; Fang-Fang Wu; Lynn M Flickinger; Giske Ursin; Catherine R Elliott; Lois Shepherd; Richard M Weinshilboum; Paul E Goss; James N Ingle
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Mammographic density and epithelial histopathologic markers.

Authors:  Martijn Verheus; Gertraud Maskarinec; Eva Erber; Jana S Steude; Jeffrey Killeen; Brenda Y Hernandez; J Mark Cline
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.