Literature DB >> 6493623

Cerebral evoked potentials associated with the compensatory reactions following stance and gait perturbation.

V Dietz, J Quintern, W Berger.   

Abstract

We have studied the gastrocnemius electromyographic (EMG) responses and the cerebral potentials evoked in normal subjects by perturbations of stance and gait in the form of short treadmill acceleration impulses. In the stance condition a small EMG response (LM1; latency around 40 ms) was followed by a strong muscle activation (LM2; latency 75-90 ms). Following perturbation during gait, LM1 was lacking and LM2 appeared a little earlier (65-75 ms). In the stance condition, the cerebral potentials appeared with shorter latency (42 ms as compared to 83 ms) and a larger amplitude (41 microV as compared to 21 microV) than those seen in the gait condition. These changes can be explained by a presynaptic inhibition of group I afferent signals during gait, which are assumed to be responsible for the early EMG and EEG responses. It is suggested that the LM2 and the cerebral responses evoked by gait perturbation are mediated by signals from group II and III afferents.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6493623     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(84)90483-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  34 in total

1.  Dissociation of muscle and cortical response scaling to balance perturbation acceleration.

Authors:  Aiden M Payne; Greg Hajcak; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Cortical activation following a balance disturbance.

Authors:  S Quant; A L Adkin; W R Staines; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The relationship between physiological arousal and cortical and autonomic responses to postural instability.

Authors:  Kathryn M Sibley; George Mochizuki; James S Frank; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cortical responses associated with predictable and unpredictable compensatory balance reactions.

Authors:  Allan L Adkin; Sylvia Quant; Brian E Maki; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Cognitive demands and cortical control of human balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 6.  Cortical control of postural responses.

Authors:  J V Jacobs; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Neuromuscular strategies for the transitions between level and hill surfaces during walking.

Authors:  Jinger S Gottschall; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Postural and cortical responses following visual occlusion in standing and sitting tasks.

Authors:  Kwang Leng Goh; Susan Morris; Wee Lih Lee; Alexander Ring; Tele Tan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Different activations of the soleus and gastrocnemii muscles in response to various types of stance perturbation in man.

Authors:  A Nardone; T Corrà; M Schieppati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Gamma somatosensory cortical oscillations are attenuated during the stance phase of human walking.

Authors:  Sarah Baker; Mike Trevarrow; James Gehringer; Hannah Bergwell; David Arpin; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson; Max J Kurz
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.