Literature DB >> 14968271

Cortical activation following a balance disturbance.

S Quant1, A L Adkin, W R Staines, W E McIlroy.   

Abstract

Although recent work suggests that cortical processing can be involved in the control of balance responses, the central mechanisms involved in these reactions remain unclear. We presently investigated the characteristics of scalp-recorded perturbation-evoked responses (PERs) following a balance disturbance. Eight young adults stabilized an inverted pendulum using their ankle musculature while seated. When perturbations were applied to the pendulum, subjects were instructed to return (active condition) or not return (passive condition) the pendulum to its original stable position. Primary measures included peak latency and amplitude of early PERs (the first negative peak between 100 and 150 ms, N1), amplitude of late PERs (between 200 and 400 ms) and onset and initial amplitude of ankle muscle responses. Based on the timing of PERs, we hypothesized that N1 would represent sensory processing of the balance disturbance and that late PERs would be linked to the sensorimotor processing of balance corrections. Our results revealed that N1 was maximal over frontal-central electrode sites (FCz and Cz). Average N1 measures at FCz, Cz, and CPz were comparable between active and passive tasks ( p>0.05). In contrast, the amplitude of late PERs at Cz was less positive for the active condition than for the passive ( p<0.05). The similarity in N1 between tasks suggests a sensory representation of early PERs. Differences in late PERs may represent sensorimotor processing related to the execution of balance responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14968271     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1744-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Temporal properties of attention sharing consequent to disturbed balance.

Authors:  W E McIlroy; R G Norrie; J D Brooke; D C Bishop; A J Nelson; B E Maki
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-09-29       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Neuromagnetic localization of N15, the initial cortical response to lip stimulus.

Authors:  K Nagamatsu; N Nakasato; K Hatanaka; A Kanno; M Iwasaki; T Yoshimoto
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Modulation of afferent inflow during the control of balancing tasks using the lower limbs.

Authors:  William Evans McIlroy; Darcy Claire Bishop; William Richard Staines; Aimee Jennifer Nelson; Brian Edward Maki; John Dennis Brooke
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Sensori-sensory afferent conditioning with leg movement: gain control in spinal reflex and ascending paths.

Authors:  J D Brooke; J Cheng; D F Collins; W E McIlroy; J E Misiaszek; W R Staines
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Accidental falls in a rehabilitation setting.

Authors:  D K DeVincenzo; S Watkins
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.625

6.  Cortical potentials evoked by finger displacement in man.

Authors:  D Papakostopoulos; R Cooper; H J Crow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Cerebral evoked potentials associated with the compensatory reactions following stance and gait perturbation.

Authors:  V Dietz; J Quintern; W Berger
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1984-09-07       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man.

Authors:  N K Squires; K C Squires; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-04

9.  Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man.

Authors:  R T Knight
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-02

10.  Mechanically evoked cerebral potentials to sudden ankle dorsiflexion in human subjects during standing.

Authors:  B Dimitrov; T Gavrilenko; P Gatev
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1996-04-26       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  24 in total

1.  Dissociation of muscle and cortical response scaling to balance perturbation acceleration.

Authors:  Aiden M Payne; Greg Hajcak; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The relationship between physiological arousal and cortical and autonomic responses to postural instability.

Authors:  Kathryn M Sibley; George Mochizuki; James S Frank; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cortical responses associated with predictable and unpredictable compensatory balance reactions.

Authors:  Allan L Adkin; Sylvia Quant; Brian E Maki; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Cognitive demands and cortical control of human balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Parallels in control of voluntary and perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp movements: EMG and kinematics.

Authors:  William H Gage; Karl F Zabjek; Stephen W Hill; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Cortical control of postural responses.

Authors:  J V Jacobs; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Loss of balance during balance beam walking elicits a multifocal theta band electrocortical response.

Authors:  Amy R Sipp; Joseph T Gwin; Scott Makeig; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Cognition and balance control: does processing of explicit contextual cues of impending perturbations modulate automatic postural responses?

Authors:  Daniel Boari Coelho; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Postural and cortical responses following visual occlusion in standing and sitting tasks.

Authors:  Kwang Leng Goh; Susan Morris; Wee Lih Lee; Alexander Ring; Tele Tan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of speed and direction of perturbation on electroencephalographic and balance responses.

Authors:  Rahul Goel; Recep A Ozdemir; Sho Nakagome; Jose L Contreras-Vidal; William H Paloski; Pranav J Parikh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.