Literature DB >> 17551085

Should healthcare providers have a duty to warn family members of individuals with an HNPCC-causing mutation? A survey of patients from the Ontario Familial Colon Cancer Registry.

Kelly Kohut, Michael Manno, Steven Gallinger, Mary Jane Esplen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As genetic testing becomes more common and increasingly intertwined with medical care, the issues of genetic privacy and doctor-patient confidentiality are being examined. Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a genetic predisposition to colorectal and certain other cancers. Effective screening that can prevent colorectal cancer is an important incentive for genetic testing.
METHODS: A survey regarding the duty to warn family members of the risks associated with an HNPCC-causing mutation was mailed to 227 participants in the Ontario Familial Colon Cancer Registry (OFCCR). To our knowledge, the opinions of patients on this subject have not been reported previously in the literature. Responses were analysed quantitatively using the SAS system and qualitatively by the review of written comments.
RESULTS: Completed surveys were returned by 105 participants, with a response rate of 46.3%. The majority felt a personal responsibility to warn relatives, but there was no significant agreement that doctors or genetic counsellors should have a duty to warn relatives without a patient's permission.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing genetic testing for HNPCC generally understand that relatives could benefit from being informed of genetic risk, but may not be willing or able to inform each family member. Healthcare professionals should engage patients in a discussion of familial implications before genetic testing. An agreement should be formulated regarding which of the relatives should be informed. Patients should be encouraged to personally disseminate the information, given the unrealistic burden on practitioners to perform this task and patients' preference for control over the information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17551085      PMCID: PMC2740891          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2006.047357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  25 in total

1.  The physician as gatekeeper to the use of genetic information in the criminal justice system.

Authors:  Samuel C Seiden; Karine Morin
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 2.  Genetic privacy.

Authors:  Pamela Sankar
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2001-12-03       Impact factor: 13.739

3.  Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder.

Authors:  G K Suthers; J Armstrong; J McCormack; D Trott
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  All in the family: evaluation of the process and content of sisters' communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes; Caryn Lerman; Marc Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Lari Wenzel; Steven Narod; Camille Corio; Kenneth P Tercyak; Danielle Hanna; Claudine Isaacs; David Main
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-01-15

5.  Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  K Aktan-Collan; A Haukkala; J P Mecklin; A Uutela; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Genetic information and the family: are we our brother's keeper?

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 7.  The family covenant and genetic testing.

Authors:  D J Doukas; J W Berg
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  Ontario familial colon cancer registry: methods and first-year response rates.

Authors:  M Cotterchio; G McKeown-Eyssen; H Sutherland; G Buchan; M Aronson; A M Easson; J Macey; E Holowaty; S Gallinger
Journal:  Chronic Dis Can       Date:  2000

9.  Factors influencing patients' decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services.

Authors:  K P Geer; M E Ropka; W F Cohn; S M Jones; S Miesfeldt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Parent-child factors and their effect on communicating BRCA1/2 test results to children.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco; Barbara M Brogan; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-06
View more
  10 in total

1.  Unsolicited information letters to increase awareness of Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer: reactions and attitudes.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen; Charlotte Kvist Lautrup; Lars Joachim Lindberg; Steen Ladelund; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Patients' experiences and views of cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH): a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nina Hallowell; Nick Jenkins; Margaret Douglas; Simon Walker; Robert Finnie; Mary Porteous; Julia Lawton
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-09-02

3.  Hereditary colorectal cancer registries in Canada: report from the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada consensus meeting; Montreal, Quebec; October 28, 2011.

Authors:  H Rothenmund; H Singh; B Candas; B N Chodirker; K Serfas; M Aronson; S Holter; A Volenik; J Green; E Dicks; M O Woods; D Gilchrist; R Gryfe; Z Cohen; W D Foulkes
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.

Authors:  Miriam E Wiens; Brenda J Wilson; Christina Honeywell; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-15

5.  Colorectal cancer cases and relatives of cases indicate similar willingness to receive and disclose genetic information.

Authors:  Rachel M Ceballos; Polly A Newcomb; Jeannette M Beasley; Scot Peterson; Allyson Templeton; Julie R Hunt
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-09

Review 6.  Health-care professionals' responsibility to patients' relatives in genetic medicine: a systematic review and synthesis of empirical research.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Angela Fenwick; Shiri Shkedi-Rafid; Gillian Crawford; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  "It would be so much easier": health system-led genetic risk notification-feasibility and acceptability of cascade screening in an integrated system.

Authors:  Nora B Henrikson; Paula R Blasi; Stephanie M Fullerton; Jane Grafton; Kathleen A Leppig; Gail P Jarvik; Eric B Larson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-03-06

8.  My sister's keeper?: genomic research and the identifiability of siblings.

Authors:  Christopher A Cassa; Brian Schmidt; Isaac S Kohane; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  'Is this knowledge mine and nobody else's? I don't feel that.' Patient views about consent, confidentiality and information-sharing in genetic medicine.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Attitudes towards the sharing of genetic information with at-risk relatives: results of a quantitative survey.

Authors:  Timothy J Heaton; Victoria Chico
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.132

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.