Literature DB >> 17550415

Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery.

Andrew P Evan1, James A McAteer, Bret A Connors, Philip M Blomgren, James E Lingeman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the tissue protection afforded by simply reducing the rate of shock wave (SW) delivery, compared with studies in the pig in which SW lithotripsy (SWL)-induced vascular damage was significantly reduced by initiating treatment using low-amplitude SWs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Juvenile pigs (6-7 weeks old) were treated with an unmodified lithotripter (HM3, Dornier Medical Systems, Kennesaw, GA) at either 120 or 30 SW/min. Treatment was to one kidney per pig, with SWs (2000, 24 kV) directed to a lower-pole calyx. After treatment, parenchymal haemorrhage was determined morphometrically and expressed as percentage of functional renal volume (%FRV).
RESULTS: Kidneys treated at 120 SW/min had focal to extensive subcapsular haematomas. Parenchymal lesions were found only at the lower pole, but included regions within renal papillae and the cortex. Occasionally, damage extended across the full thickness of the kidney. The lesion in the pigs treated at 120 SW/min occupied a mean (sd) of 4.6 (1.7) %FRV. Kidneys of pigs treated at 30 SW/min showed no surface bleeding. Parenchymal haemorrhage was limited to papillae within the focal volume, and measured 0.08 (0.02) %FRV, a significant (P < 0.005) reduction in injury.
CONCLUSIONS: Slowing the rate of delivery to 30 SW/min has a dramatic protective effect on the integrity of the kidney vasculature. This finding in our established pig model suggests a potential strategy to improve the safety of lithotripsy. As it was shown that a reduced SW rate also improves the efficiency of stone fragmentation, a slow rate appears to be a means to improve both the safety and efficacy of SWL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17550415     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07007.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  36 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

Review 2.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

3.  Shock wave lithotripsy and renal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jonathan Silberstein; Charles M Lakin; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

4.  Shock-induced bubble jetting into a viscous fluid with application to tissue injury in shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J B Freund; R K Shukla; A P Evan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Shock wave lithotripsy in patients requiring anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents.

Authors:  Bader Alsaikhan; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Engineering Better Lithotripters.

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Editorial Comment on: The Impact of Dust and Confinement on Fragmentation of Kidney Stones by Shockwave Lithotripsy in Tissue Phantoms by Randad et al. (From: Randad A, Ahn J, Bailey MR, et al. J Endourol 2019;33:400-406; DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0516).

Authors:  Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Evaluation of the LithoGold LG-380 lithotripter: in vitro acoustic characterization and assessment of renal injury in the pig model.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Bret A Connors; Rajash K Handa; James E Lingeman; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 9.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Effect of high shock number on acute complication development after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Miriam Hadj-Moussa; James A Brown
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.