Literature DB >> 16783123

Perception of risk and surveillance practices of women with a family history of breast cancer.

Wanda Martin1, Lesley Degner.   

Abstract

A retrospective study was designed to examine the relationship between perception of risk and surveillance activities (mammography and clinical breast examination) in women with a family history of breast cancer. The Revised Susceptibility, Benefits, and Barriers Scale for Mammography Screening, the Centre for Epidemiology Studies--Depression Scale (CES-D), and a demographic form were administered to a convenience sample of 56 women. There were no significant relationships between perceived risk and screening activities. No significant correlations were found between age or depressive symptoms with either perceived risk or screening behaviors. Women with postsecondary qualifications were more likely to obtain regular mammograms. A substantial portion (34.5%) of participants reported depressive symptoms at a level associated with clinically significant levels of depression (>or=16 on the CES-D). Women over age 50 reported significantly more depressive symptoms than younger women. Perceived risk was not associated with screening; however, depression should be considered closely when dealing with women with higher-than-average risk of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16783123     DOI: 10.1097/00002820-200605000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  9 in total

1.  Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; James E Slaven; Patrick Monohan; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Influence of perceived breast cancer risk on screening behaviors of female relatives from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Li Rita Zhang; Anna M Chiarelli; Gord Glendon; Lucia Mirea; Sarah Edwards; Julia A Knight; Irene L Andrulis; Paul Ritvo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  How old are African American women when they receive their first mammogram? Results from a church-based study.

Authors:  Janice V Bowie; Anita M Wells; Hee-Soon Juon; Kim D Sydnor; Elisa M Rodriguez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-08

4.  Relationships of Family History-related Factors and Causal Beliefs to Cancer Risk Perception and Mammography Screening Adherence Among Medically Underserved Women.

Authors:  Soo Jung Hong; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2020-07-16

5.  Does perceived risk predict breast cancer screening use? Findings from a prospective cohort study of female relatives from the Ontario site of the breast cancer family registry.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Lucia Mirea; Gord Glendon; Paul Ritvo; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  The impact of breast cancer genetic risk assessment on intentions to perform cancer surveillance behaviors.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Gethin Griffith; Barbara France; Kate Brain; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Technical note: Low clinical efficacy, but good acceptability of a point-of-care electronic palpation device for breast cancer screening for a lower middle-income environment.

Authors:  Dustin Valdez; Teofila Cruz; Stephanie Rania; Grazyna Badowski; Kevin Cassel; Thomas Wolfgruber; Scott Grosskreutz; Louis J Dulana; Roy Adonay; Gertraud Maskarinec; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Factors influencing cancer risk perception in high risk populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jon C Tilburt; Katherine M James; Pamela S Sinicrope; David T Eton; Brian A Costello; Jantey Carey; Melanie A Lane; Shawna L Ehlers; Patricia J Erwin; Katherine E Nowakowski; Mohammad H Murad
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.857

9.  Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  K Hanson; P Montgomery; D Bakker; M Conlon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.