Literature DB >> 17548812

Stochastic innovation as a mechanism by which catalysts might self-assemble into chemical reaction networks.

Justin A Bradford1, Ken A Dill.   

Abstract

We develop a computer model for how two different chemical catalysts in solution, A and B, could be driven to form AB complexes, based on the concentration gradients of a substrate or product that they share in common. If A's product is B's substrate, B will be attracted to A, mediated by a common resource that is not otherwise plentiful in the environment. By this simple physicochemical mechanism, chemical reactions could spontaneously associate to become chained together in solution. According to the model, such catalyst self-association processes may resemble other processes of "stochastic innovation," such as Darwinian evolution in biology, that involve a search among options, a selection among those options, and then a lock-in of that selection. Like Darwinian processes, this simple chemical process exhibits cooperation, competition, innovation, and a preference for consistency. This model may be useful for understanding organizational processes in prebiotic chemistry and for developing new kinds of self-organization in chemically reacting systems.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17548812      PMCID: PMC1891208          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703522104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

Review 1.  Reverse engineering of biological complexity.

Authors:  Marie E Csete; John C Doyle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Complexity and robustness.

Authors:  J M Carlson; John Doyle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The evolutionary origin of complex features.

Authors:  Richard E Lenski; Charles Ofria; Robert T Pennock; Christoph Adami
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Continuous in vitro evolution of catalytic function.

Authors:  M C Wright; G F Joyce
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Hebbian synapses in hippocampus.

Authors:  S R Kelso; A H Ganong; T H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Autocatalytic sets of proteins.

Authors:  S A Kauffman
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1986-03-07       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  The lipid world.

Authors:  D Segré; D Ben-Eli; D W Deamer; D Lancet
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2001 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 1.950

8.  Isolation of new ribozymes from a large pool of random sequences [see comment].

Authors:  D P Bartel; J W Szostak
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A model for the emergence of cooperation, interdependence, and structure in evolving networks.

Authors:  S Jain; S Krishna
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Functional proteins from a random-sequence library.

Authors:  A D Keefe; J W Szostak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The last universal common ancestor: emergence, constitution and genetic legacy of an elusive forerunner.

Authors:  Nicolas Glansdorff; Ying Xu; Bernard Labedan
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 4.540

2.  Compositional inheritance: comparison of self-assembly and catalysis.

Authors:  Meng Wu; Paul G Higgs
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  Driving forces in the origins of life.

Authors:  K A Dill; L Agozzino
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 6.411

4.  Nanoscale Catalyst Chemotaxis Can Drive the Assembly of Functional Pathways.

Authors:  Charles Kocher; Luca Agozzino; Ken Dill
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.466

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.