Literature DB >> 17546470

A Bayesian model unifies multisensory spatial localization with the physiological properties of the superior colliculus.

Benjamin Rowland1, Terrence Stanford, Barry Stein.   

Abstract

"Multisensory integration" refers to the phenomenon by which information from different senses is integrated in order to interpret and guide responses to external events. Here, we advance two specific hypotheses: (1) the process of multisensory integration in spatial localization is statistically optimal, and (2) the optimality of the processes guiding this localization results from the implementation of Bayes' rule. We explicitly test the predictions of an optimal (Bayesian) model for the behavior of animals trained and tested in a spatial localization task, and find that the model correctly predicts behavioral patterns which are at times counterintuitive. The model also predicts the receptive field properties of superior colliculus neurons that are involved in these behaviors, and sheds new light on the computational responsibilities different circuits have in effecting these behaviors. Thus, the Bayesian model appears to represent not only a yardstick for the optimality of a behavior, but also a descriptor of the underlying neural processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17546470     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0847-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  29 in total

1.  Using Bayes' rule to model multisensory enhancement in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  T J Anastasio; P E Patton; K Belkacem-Boussaid
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  The influence of visual and auditory receptive field organization on multisensory integration in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  D C Kadunce; J W Vaughan; M T Wallace; B E Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction.

Authors:  Francesca Frassinetti; Nadia Bolognini; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation.

Authors:  David C Knill; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Sound localization acuity in the cat: effect of azimuth, signal duration, and test procedure.

Authors:  R S Heffner; H E Heffner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Binaural mechanisms of spatial tuning in the cat's superior colliculus distinguished using monaural occlusion.

Authors:  J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Spatial and temporal factors determine auditory-visual interactions in human saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  M A Frens; A J Van Opstal; R F Van der Willigen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

9.  Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  M A Meredith; B E Stein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Visual-auditory interactions in sensorimotor processing: saccades versus manual responses.

Authors:  H C Hughes; P A Reuter-Lorenz; G Nozawa; R Fendrich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  31 in total

1.  Specialization of binaural responses in ventral auditory cortices.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Douglas A Storace; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Spatial heterogeneity of cortical receptive fields and its impact on multisensory interactions.

Authors:  Brian N Carriere; David W Royal; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Perisaccadic localization of auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Steffen Klingenhoefer; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multisensory enhancement: gains in choice and in simple response times.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Connectional parameters determine multisensory processing in a spiking network model of multisensory convergence.

Authors:  H K Lim; L P Keniston; J H Shin; B L Allman; M A Meredith; K J Cios
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Enhancement of response times to bi- and tri-modal sensory stimuli during active movements.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Amanda H Turner; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Lip-reading aids word recognition most in moderate noise: a Bayesian explanation using high-dimensional feature space.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Xiang Zhou; Lars A Ross; John J Foxe; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Perspectives on sensory processing disorder: a call for translational research.

Authors:  Lucy J Miller; Darci M Nielsen; Sarah A Schoen; Barbara A Brett-Green
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.