Literature DB >> 17992522

Enhancement of response times to bi- and tri-modal sensory stimuli during active movements.

David Hecht1, Miriam Reiner, Avi Karni.   

Abstract

Simultaneous activation of two sensory modalities can improve perception and enhance performance. This multi-sensory enhancement had been previously observed only in conditions wherein participants were not performing any movement. Since tactile perception is attenuated during active movements, we investigated whether a bi- and a tri-modal enhancement can occur also when participants are presented with tactile stimuli, while engaged in active movements. Participants held a pen-like stylus and performed bidirectional writing-like movements inside a restricted workspace. During these movements participants were given a uni-modal sensory signal (visual--a thin gray line; auditory--a brief sound; haptic--a mechanical resisting force delivered through the stylus) or a bi- or tri-modal combination of these uni-modal signals, and their task was to respond, by pressing a button on the stylus, as soon as any one of these three stimuli was detected. Results showed that a combination of tri-modal signals was detected faster than any of the bi-modal combinations, which in turn were detected faster than any of the uni-modal signals. These facilitations exceeded the "Race model" predictions. A breakdown of the time gained in the bi-modal combinations by hemispace, hands and gender, provide further support for the "inverse effectiveness" principle, as the maximal bi-modal enhancements occurred for the least effective uni-modal responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17992522     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1191-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

1.  Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation.

Authors:  M HERSHENSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-03

2.  Integration of touch and sound in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Christopher I Petkov; Mark Augath; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.

Authors:  D H RAAB
Journal:  Trans N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1962-03

Review 4.  Interaction of vestibular, somatosensory and visual signals for postural control and motion perception under terrestrial and microgravity conditions--a conceptual model.

Authors:  T Mergner; T Rosemeier
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1998-11

5.  Gating of tactile input from the hand. I. Effects of finger movement.

Authors:  R F Schmidt; W J Schady; H E Torebjörk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement?

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Gating of sensation and evoked potentials following foot stimulation during human gait.

Authors:  J Duysens; A A Tax; S Nawijn; W Berger; T Prokop; E Altenmüller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Velocity-dependent suppression of cutaneous sensitivity during movement.

Authors:  R W Angel; R C Malenka
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Audiovisual integration in patients with visual deficit.

Authors:  Francesca Frassinetti; Nadia Bolognini; Davide Bottari; Annalisa Bonora; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  An irrelevant light enhances auditory detection in humans: a psychophysical analysis of multisensory integration in stimulus detection.

Authors:  Christopher T Lovelace; Barry E Stein; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-07
View more
  10 in total

1.  Multisensory enhancement: gains in choice and in simple response times.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  When two heads are better than one: Interactive versus independent benefits of collaborative cognition.

Authors:  Allison A Brennan; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

Review 3.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

4.  Combining eye and hand in search is suboptimal.

Authors:  Hanneke Liesker; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The differing impact of multisensory and unisensory integration on behavior.

Authors:  Guy Gingras; Benjamin A Rowland; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  MR-Compatible Haptic Display of Membrane Puncture in Robot-Assisted Needle Procedures.

Authors:  Amy Kyungwon Han; Jung Hwa Bae; Katerina C Gregoriou; Christopher J Ploch; Roger E Goldman; Gary H Glover; Bruce L Daniel; Mark R Cutkosky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 8.  Challenges in quantifying multisensory integration: alternative criteria, models, and inverse effectiveness.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Ramnarayan Ramachandran; Thomas J Perrault; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect.

Authors:  Hillel Pratt; Naomi Bleich; Nomi Mittelman
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  The effects of substitute multisensory feedback on task performance and the sense of presence in a virtual reality environment.

Authors:  Natalia Cooper; Ferdinando Milella; Carlo Pinto; Iain Cant; Mark White; Georg Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.