Literature DB >> 8133219

Visual-auditory interactions in sensorimotor processing: saccades versus manual responses.

H C Hughes1, P A Reuter-Lorenz, G Nozawa, R Fendrich.   

Abstract

Reaction times (RTs) to bimodal (visual and auditory) stimuli were examined using 3 different response systems: saccades, directed manual responses, and simple manual responses. The observed levels of intersensory facilitation exceeded race model predictions and therefore support summation (coactivation) models of bimodal processing. However, response-dependent differences suggest that the processing of bimodal targets also depends on the relevant sensorimotor pathways and requirements of the task. Coactivation of response mechanisms might account for the effects found using simple RTs. The results for saccades are consistent with known patterns of auditory-visual convergence in the oculomotor system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8133219     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.1.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  74 in total

1.  Sensory and multisensory responses in the newborn monkey superior colliculus.

Authors:  M T Wallace; B E Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Two stages in crossmodal saccadic integration: evidence from a visual-auditory focused attention task.

Authors:  Petra A Arndt; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cross-modal sensory processing in the anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  Paul J Laurienti; Mark T Wallace; Joseph A Maldjian; Christina M Susi; Barry E Stein; Jonathan H Burdette
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Multisensory enhancement of localization under conditions of induced myopia.

Authors:  W David Hairston; Paul J Laurienti; Gautam Mishra; Jonathan H Burdette; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance.

Authors:  Paul J Laurienti; Robert A Kraft; Joseph A Maldjian; Jonathan H Burdette; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Catching audiovisual mice: predicting the arrival time of auditory-visual motion signals.

Authors:  M Hofbauer; S M Wuerger; G F Meyer; F Roehrbein; K Schill; C Zetzsche
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  The development of audiovisual multisensory integration across childhood and early adolescence: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  Alice B Brandwein; John J Foxe; Natalie N Russo; Ted S Altschuler; Hilary Gomes; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Perceptuo-motor compatibility governs multisensory integration in bimanual coordination dynamics.

Authors:  Gregory Zelic; Denis Mottet; Julien Lagarde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Effects of stimulus-response uncertainty on saccades to near-threshold targets.

Authors:  Kestutis Kveraga; Howard C Hughes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.