Literature DB >> 11545469

The influence of visual and auditory receptive field organization on multisensory integration in the superior colliculus.

D C Kadunce1, J W Vaughan, M T Wallace, B E Stein.   

Abstract

The spatial register of the different receptive fields of multisensory neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) plays a significant role in determining the responses of these neurons to cross-modal stimulus combinations. Spatially coincident visual-auditory stimuli fall within these overlapping receptive fields and generally produce response enhancements that exceed the individual modality-specific responses and can exceed their sum. Yet, in this context, it has not been clear how "spatial coincidence" is operationally defined. Given the large size of SC receptive fields, visual and auditory stimuli could be within their respective receptive fields even when there are substantial spatial disparities between them. Indeed, previous observations have raised the possibility that there may be a second level of determinism in how SC neurons deal with the relative spatial locations of within-field cross-modal stimuli; specifically, that multisensory response enhancements become progressively weaker as the within-field visual and auditory stimuli become increasingly disparate. While the present experiments demonstrated that SC multisensory neurons have heterogeneous receptive fields, and that the greatest number of impulses evoked were by stimuli that fell within the area of cross-modal receptive field overlap, they also indicate that there is no systematic relationship between cross-modal stimulus disparity and the magnitude of multisensory response enhancement. Thus, two within-field cross-modal stimuli produced the same proportionate change (i.e., multisensory response enhancement) when they were widely disparate as they did when they overlapped one another in space. These observations indicate that cross-modal spatial coincidence can be defined operationally by the borders of an SC neuron's receptive fields regardless of the size of those receptive fields and/or the absolute spatial disparity between within-field cross-modal stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11545469     DOI: 10.1007/s002210100772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Sensory and multisensory responses in the newborn monkey superior colliculus.

Authors:  M T Wallace; B E Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Visual-tactile integration: does stimulus duration influence the relative amount of response enhancement?

Authors:  Stefan Rach; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Incorporating cross-modal statistics in the development and maintenance of multisensory integration.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Liping Yu; Benjamin A Rowland; Terrence R Stanford; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Alterations to multisensory and unisensory integration by stimulus competition.

Authors:  Scott R Pluta; Benjamin A Rowland; Terrence R Stanford; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Neonatal cortical ablation disrupts multisensory development in superior colliculus.

Authors:  Wan Jiang; Huai Jiang; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Impact of response duration on multisensory integration.

Authors:  Dipanwita Ghose; Zachary P Barnett; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Multisensory integration in the superior colliculus: a neural network model.

Authors:  Mauro Ursino; Cristiano Cuppini; Elisa Magosso; Andrea Serino; Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 9.  Organization and plasticity in multisensory integration: early and late experience affects its governing principles.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  Behavioral studies of auditory-visual spatial recognition and integration in rats.

Authors:  Shuzo Sakata; Tetsuo Yamamori; Yoshio Sakurai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.