Literature DB >> 8610665

Effectiveness of contact isolation during a hospital outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

J A Jernigan1, M G Titus, D H Gröschel, S Getchell-White, B M Farr.   

Abstract

Contact isolation has been recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the prevention of nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), but there are few data which prospectively quantitate the effectiveness of contact isolation for this purpose. During an outbreak of MRSA in a neonatal intensive care unit between July 18, 1991 and January 30, 1992, weekly surveillance cultures were performed on all patients. Sixteen of 331 admissions became colonized with MRSA, and 3 (19%) developed infections: bacteremia, conjunctivitis, and dialysis catheter site infection. The isolates from all 16 patients were submitted to plasmid profile analysis and restriction enzyme analysis of whole cell DNA. All of the patients had identical chromosomal patterns and plasmid profiles, which differed from control isolates from other wards, indicating that the outbreak resulted from spread of a unique strain. None of 144 personnel who were cultured after recent contact with newly colonized patients during the outbreak were found to carry MRSA, which suggests that patients were the reservoir for transmission rather than caregivers. The most probable source for each individual transmission was determined based on proximity in time and space and shared exposure to caregivers. The rate of transmission of MRSA from patients on contact isolation was significantly lower (0.009 transmissions per day on isolation) than the rate for patients not on isolation (0.140 transmissions per day unisolated, relative risk = 15.6, 95% confidence interval 5.3-45.6, p < 0.0001). The authors conclude that the risk of nosocomial transmission of MRSA was reduced 16-fold by contact isolation during the outbreak in this neonatal intensive care unit. These data confirm the results of previous studies which have suggested that contact isolation was effective in controlling the epidemic spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8610665     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  64 in total

1.  Microbiologic surveillance using nasal cultures alone is sufficient for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in neonates.

Authors:  Kamaljit Singh; Patrick J Gavin; Thomas Vescio; Richard B Thomson Jr; Ruth B Deddish; Adrienne Fisher; Gary A Noskin; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  A S Haddadin; S A Fappiano; P A Lipsett
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Isolation measures in the hospital management of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  B S Cooper; S P Stone; C C Kibbler; B D Cookson; J A Roberts; G F Medley; G Duckworth; R Lai; S Ebrahim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-04

5.  Spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a large tertiary NICU: network analysis.

Authors:  Alon Geva; Sharon B Wright; Linda M Baldini; Jane A Smallcomb; Charles Safran; James E Gray
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  David K Warren; Robert S Liao; Liana R Merz; Michael Eveland; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Concurrent analysis of nose and groin swab specimens by the IDI-MRSA PCR assay is comparable to analysis by individual-specimen PCR and routine culture assays for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Emma J Bishop; Elizabeth A Grabsch; Susan A Ballard; Barrie Mayall; Shirley Xie; Rhea Martin; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Optimal surveillance culture sites for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in newborns.

Authors:  Alana Rosenthal; Diane White; Sheila Churilla; Sandra Brodie; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections of the eye and orbit (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Preston Howard Blomquist
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

10.  MRSA detection: comparison of two molecular methods (BD GeneOhm PCR assay and Easy-Plex) with two selective MRSA agars (MRSA-ID and Oxoid MRSA) for nasal swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; Z Jennings; D Stark; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.