Literature DB >> 1753157

Left ventricular wall thickness measurements by magnetic resonance: a validation study.

U J Haag1, O M Hess, S E Maier, M Jakob, K Liu, D Meier, R Jenni, P Boesiger, M Anliker, H P Krayenbuehl.   

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) wall thickness was determined by magnetic resonance (MR) in 15 patients (7 controls and 8 patients with coronary artery disease). End-diastolic (ed) and end-systolic (es) wall thickness were measured in a short axis view perpendicular to the LV long axis. Wall thickness measurements were compared to data obtained by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and M-mode echocardiography (Echo). End-diastolic and end-systolic wall thickness were significantly overestimated by MR (34% and 37%, respectively) when compared to DSA. In contrast, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic chamber diameter were significantly underestimated by MR (25% and 30%, respectively) when compared to DSA. However, fractioned shortening was similar (all NS) for MR (48 +/- 22%), DSA (54 +/- 15%) and Echo (44 +/- 10%), respectively. The mean difference (= accuracy) and the standard deviation of difference (= precision) for LV wall thickness was 0.4 +/- 0.2 cm between MR and DSA, 0.4 +/- 0.3 cm between MR and ECHO and 0.03 +/- 0.1 cm between DSA and ECHO. The correlation of wall thickness between MR and DSA (correlation coefficient r = 0.74, p less than 0.001) and between MR and Echo (r = 0.70, p less than 0.001) was good although the standard error of estimate (SEE) was 17% for MR vs. DSA and 21% for MR vs. Echo. The corresponding SEE for chamber diameter was 16% between MR and DSA and 19% between MR and Echo, respectively. Intraobserver variability for wall thickness determination by MR was excellent (correlation coefficient r = 0.99, p less than 0.001) SEE of 4%. Interobserver variability was also good (correlation coefficient r = 0.90, p less than 0.001) with a SEE of 12%. It is concluded that LV wall thickness and chamber diameter (short axis plane) can be determined by MR with good precision but only satisfactory accuracy. LV wall thickness is significantly overestimated probably due to signals from static blood which might be indistinguishable from the subendocardium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1753157     DOI: 10.1007/bf01797678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  15 in total

1.  Measurement of left ventricular mass in vivo using gated nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M S Florentine; C L Grosskreutz; W Chang; J A Hartnett; V D Dunn; J C Ehrhardt; S R Fleagle; S M Collins; M L Marcus; D J Skorton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Multiphasic cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: normal regional left ventricular wall thickening.

Authors:  M R Fisher; G K von Schulthess; C B Higgins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  [Value of nuclear magnetic resonance in dilated cardiomyopathy. Approach to intraventricular hemodynamics].

Authors:  P Germain; J Baruthio; D Wecker; J P Favier; P Wahl; J Chambron; A Sacrez
Journal:  Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss       Date:  1987-11

5.  Normal cardiac dimensions by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  B F Byrd; N B Schiller; E H Botvinick; C B Higgins
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1985-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in determination of cardiac dimensions in normal subjects.

Authors:  B J Friedman; J Waters; O L Kwan; A N DeMaria
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  [Evaluation of regional contraction disorders of the left ventricle with two-dimensional echocardiography].

Authors:  O M Hess; J D Carroll; C Brayshaw; H P Krayenbühl
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1983-06-04

8.  Assessment of left ventricular muscle volume by digital angiocardiography.

Authors:  W Radtke; J H Bürsch; R Brennecke; H J Hahne; P H Heintzen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Comparison of intravenous digital subtraction cineangiocardiography with conventional contrast ventriculography for the determination of the left ventricular volume at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  B Birchler; O M Hess; T Murakami; P Niederer; M Anliker; H P Krayenbuehl
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Regional left ventricular wall thickening by magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation in normal persons and patients with global and regional dysfunction.

Authors:  U Sechtem; B A Sommerhoff; W Markiewicz; R D White; M D Cheitlin; C B Higgins
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of active contour model extensions for automated cardiac MR image segmentation by regional error assessment.

Authors:  Duy Nguyen; Karen Masterson; Jean-Paul Vallée
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Quantitative analysis of cardiovascular MR images.

Authors:  R J van der Geest; A de Roos; E E van der Wall; J H Reiber
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-06

3.  Normal left ventricular myocardial thickness for middle-aged and older subjects with steady-state free precession cardiac magnetic resonance: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Nadine Kawel; Evrim B Turkbey; J Jeffrey Carr; John Eng; Antoinette S Gomes; W Gregory Hundley; Craig Johnson; Sofia C Masri; Martin R Prince; Rob J van der Geest; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Myocardial wall thickening from gated Magnetic Resonance images using Laplace's equation.

Authors:  M Prasad; A Ramesh; P Kavanagh; J Gerlach; G Germano; Ds Berman; Pj Slomka
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2009-02-10

5.  Assessment of myocardial viability in a porcine model of chronic coronary artery stenosis with dual dose dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Dymarkowski; M Szilard; A Maes; X S Liu; Y M Huang; E Verbeken; L Mortelmans; J Bogaert; I De Scheerder
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Quantification of 3D regional myocardial wall thickening from gated magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Mithun Prasad; Amit Ramesh; Paul Kavanagh; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Ryo Nakazato; James Gerlach; Victor Cheng; Louise E J Thomson; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  A multilayered scaffold of a chitosan and gelatin hydrogel supported by a PCL core for cardiac tissue engineering.

Authors:  Seokwon Pok; Jackson D Myers; Sundararajan V Madihally; Jeffrey G Jacot
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Strain analysis is superior to wall thickening in discriminating between infarcted myocardium with and without microvascular obstruction.

Authors:  Henk Everaars; Lourens F H J Robbers; Marco Götte; Pierre Croisille; Alexander Hirsch; Paul F A Teunissen; Peter M van de Ven; Niels van Royen; Felix Zijlstra; Jan J Piek; Albert C van Rossum; Robin Nijveldt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.