BACKGROUND: Increased left ventricular myocardial thickness (LVMT) is a feature of several cardiac diseases. The purpose of this study was to establish standard reference values of normal LVMT with cardiac magnetic resonance and to assess variation with image acquisition plane, demographics, and left ventricular function. METHODS AND RESULTS: End-diastolic LVMT was measured on cardiac magnetic resonance steady-state free precession cine long and short axis images in 300 consecutive participants free of cardiac disease (169 women; 65.6 ± 8.5 years) of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort. Mean LVMT on short axis images at the mid-cavity level was 5.3 ± 0.9 mm and 6.3 ± 1.1 mm for women and men, respectively. The average of the maximum LVMT at the mid-cavity for women/men was 7/9 mm (long axis) and 7/8 mm (short axis). Mean LVMT was positively associated with weight (0.02 mm/kg; P=0.01) and body surface area (1.1 mm/m(2); P<0.001). No relationship was found between mean LVMT and age or height. Greater mean LVMT was associated with lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume (0.01 mm/mL; P<0.01), a lower left ventricular end-systolic volume (-0.01 mm/mL; P=0.01), and lower left ventricular stroke volume (-0.01 mm/mL; P<0.05). LVMT measured on long axis images at the basal and mid-cavity level were slightly greater (by 6% and 10%, respectively) than measurements obtained on short axis images; apical LVMT values on long axis images were 20% less than those on short axis images. CONCLUSIONS: Normal values for wall thickness are provided for middle-aged and older subjects. Normal LVMT is lower for women than men. Observed values vary depending on the imaging plane for measurement.
BACKGROUND: Increased left ventricular myocardial thickness (LVMT) is a feature of several cardiac diseases. The purpose of this study was to establish standard reference values of normal LVMT with cardiac magnetic resonance and to assess variation with image acquisition plane, demographics, and left ventricular function. METHODS AND RESULTS: End-diastolic LVMT was measured on cardiac magnetic resonance steady-state free precession cine long and short axis images in 300 consecutive participants free of cardiac disease (169 women; 65.6 ± 8.5 years) of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort. Mean LVMT on short axis images at the mid-cavity level was 5.3 ± 0.9 mm and 6.3 ± 1.1 mm for women and men, respectively. The average of the maximum LVMT at the mid-cavity for women/men was 7/9 mm (long axis) and 7/8 mm (short axis). Mean LVMT was positively associated with weight (0.02 mm/kg; P=0.01) and body surface area (1.1 mm/m(2); P<0.001). No relationship was found between mean LVMT and age or height. Greater mean LVMT was associated with lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume (0.01 mm/mL; P<0.01), a lower left ventricular end-systolic volume (-0.01 mm/mL; P=0.01), and lower left ventricular stroke volume (-0.01 mm/mL; P<0.05). LVMT measured on long axis images at the basal and mid-cavity level were slightly greater (by 6% and 10%, respectively) than measurements obtained on short axis images; apical LVMT values on long axis images were 20% less than those on short axis images. CONCLUSIONS: Normal values for wall thickness are provided for middle-aged and older subjects. Normal LVMT is lower for women than men. Observed values vary depending on the imaging plane for measurement.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: H Thiele; E Nagel; I Paetsch; B Schnackenburg; A Bornstedt; M Kouwenhoven; A Wahl; G Schuler; E Fleck Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Khaled Alfakih; Sven Plein; Holger Thiele; Tim Jones; John P Ridgway; Mohan U Sivananthan Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Wei Li; Jessica S Stern; Vu M Mai; Linda N Pierchala; Robert R Edelman; Pottumarthi V Prasad Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Carol J Salton; Michael L Chuang; Christopher J O'Donnell; Michelle J Kupka; Martin G Larson; Kraig V Kissinger; Robert R Edelman; Daniel Levy; Warren J Manning Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-03-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Diane E Bild; David A Bluemke; Gregory L Burke; Robert Detrano; Ana V Diez Roux; Aaron R Folsom; Philip Greenland; David R Jacob; Richard Kronmal; Kiang Liu; Jennifer Clark Nelson; Daniel O'Leary; Mohammed F Saad; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; Russell P Tracy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Sharmila Dorbala; Yukio Ando; Sabahat Bokhari; Angela Dispenzieri; Rodney H Falk; Victor A Ferrari; Marianna Fontana; Olivier Gheysens; Julian D Gillmore; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Mazen A Hanna; Bouke P C Hazenberg; Arnt V Kristen; Raymond Y Kwong; Mathew S Maurer; Giampaolo Merlini; Edward J Miller; James C Moon; Venkatesh L Murthy; C Cristina Quarta; Claudio Rapezzi; Frederick L Ruberg; Sanjiv J Shah; Riemer H J A Slart; Hein J Verberne; Jamieson M Bourque Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Jonathan Carl Luis Rodrigues; Benjamin Rooms; Katie Hyde; Stephen Rohan; Angus K Nightingale; Julian Paton; Nathan Manghat; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Mark Hamilton; Henggui Zhang; David H MacIver Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Sharmila Dorbala; Yukio Ando; Sabahat Bokhari; Angela Dispenzieri; Rodney H Falk; Victor A Ferrari; Marianna Fontana; Olivier Gheysens; Julian D Gillmore; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Mazen A Hanna; Bouke P C Hazenberg; Arnt V Kristen; Raymond Y Kwong; Mathew S Maurer; Giampaolo Merlini; Edward J Miller; James C Moon; Venkatesh L Murthy; C Cristina Quarta; Claudio Rapezzi; Frederick L Ruberg; Sanjiv J Shah; Riemer H J A Slart; Hein J Verberne; Jamieson M Bourque Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Juan Carlos Plana; Maurizio Galderisi; Ana Barac; Michael S Ewer; Bonnie Ky; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Javier Ganame; Igal A Sebag; Deborah A Agler; Luigi P Badano; Jose Banchs; Daniela Cardinale; Joseph Carver; Manuel Cerqueira; Jeanne M DeCara; Thor Edvardsen; Scott D Flamm; Thomas Force; Brian P Griffin; Guy Jerusalem; Jennifer E Liu; Andreia Magalhães; Thomas Marwick; Liza Y Sanchez; Rosa Sicari; Hector R Villarraga; Patrizio Lancellotti Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Louise Hindsø; Andreas Fuchs; Jørgen Tobias Kühl; Emma Julia P Nilsson; Per Ejlstrup Sigvardsen; Lars Køber; Børge G Nordestgaard; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Scott J Hetzel; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Gabriella Captur; Christopher J Francois; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Michael Salerno; Shawn D Teague; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Rob J van der Geest; David A Bluemke Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Ryan S Dolan; Amir A Rahsepar; Julie Blaisdell; Roberto Sarnari; Kambiz Ghafourian; Jane E Wilcox; Sadiya S Khan; Esther E Vorovich; Jonathan D Rich; Clyde W Yancy; Allen S Anderson; James C Carr; Michael Markl Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2019-12-19
Authors: Gabriella Captur; Filip Zemrak; Vivek Muthurangu; Steffen E Petersen; Chunming Li; Paul Bassett; Nadine Kawel-Boehm; William J McKenna; Perry M Elliott; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke; James C Moon Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 11.105