PURPOSE: To develop 3D quantitative measures of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to validate them by comparison to standard visual scoring assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 53 consecutive subjects with short-axis slices and mid-ventricular 2-chamber/4-chamber views were analyzed. After correction for breath-hold-related misregistration, 3D myocardial boundaries were fitted to images and edited by an imaging cardiologist. Myocardial thickness was quantified at end-diastole and end-systole by computing the 3D distances using Laplace's equation. 3D thickening was represented using the standard 17-segment polar coordinates. 3D thickening was compared with 3D wall motion and with expert visual scores (6-point visual scoring of wall motion and wall thickening; 0 = normal; 5 = greatest abnormality) assigned by imaging cardiologists. RESULTS: Correlation between ejection fraction and thickening measurements was (r = 0.84; P < 0.001) compared to correlation between ejection fraction and motion measurements (r = 0.86; P < 0.001). Good negative correlation between summed visual scores and global wall thickening and motion measurements were also obtained (r(thick) = -0.79; r(motion) = -0.74). Additionally, overall good correlation between individual segmental visual scores with thickening/wall motion (r(thick) = -0.69; r(motion) = -0.65) was observed (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: 3D quantitative regional thickening and wall motion measures obtained from MRI correlate strongly with expert clinical scoring.
PURPOSE: To develop 3D quantitative measures of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to validate them by comparison to standard visual scoring assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 53 consecutive subjects with short-axis slices and mid-ventricular 2-chamber/4-chamber views were analyzed. After correction for breath-hold-related misregistration, 3D myocardial boundaries were fitted to images and edited by an imaging cardiologist. Myocardial thickness was quantified at end-diastole and end-systole by computing the 3D distances using Laplace's equation. 3D thickening was represented using the standard 17-segment polar coordinates. 3D thickening was compared with 3D wall motion and with expert visual scores (6-point visual scoring of wall motion and wall thickening; 0 = normal; 5 = greatest abnormality) assigned by imaging cardiologists. RESULTS: Correlation between ejection fraction and thickening measurements was (r = 0.84; P < 0.001) compared to correlation between ejection fraction and motion measurements (r = 0.86; P < 0.001). Good negative correlation between summed visual scores and global wall thickening and motion measurements were also obtained (r(thick) = -0.79; r(motion) = -0.74). Additionally, overall good correlation between individual segmental visual scores with thickening/wall motion (r(thick) = -0.69; r(motion) = -0.65) was observed (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: 3D quantitative regional thickening and wall motion measures obtained from MRI correlate strongly with expert clinical scoring.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nirat Beohar; James D Flaherty; Charles J Davidson; Mladen I Vidovich; Adam Brodsky; Daniel C Lee; Edwin Wu; Edward L Bolson; Robert O Bonow; Florence H Sheehan Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2007-04-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: R Beyar; E P Shapiro; W L Graves; W J Rogers; W H Guier; G A Carey; R L Soulen; E A Zerhouni; M L Weisfeldt; J L Weiss Journal: Circulation Date: 1990-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Saeed; M F Wendland; D Szolar; H Sakuma; J F Geschwind; S Globits; N Derugin; C B Higgins Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: T Sharir; D S Berman; P B Waechter; J Areeda; P B Kavanagh; J Gerlach; X Kang; G Germano Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Piotr J Slomka; David Fieno; Amit Ramesh; Vaibhav Goyal; Hidetaka Nishina; Louise E J Thompson; Rola Saouaf; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: S J Dong; J H MacGregor; A P Crawley; E McVeigh; I Belenkie; E R Smith; J V Tyberg; R Beyar Journal: Circulation Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Susana Merino-Caviedes; Lilian K Gutierrez; José Manuel Alfonso-Almazán; Santiago Sanz-Estébanez; Lucilio Cordero-Grande; Jorge G Quintanilla; Javier Sánchez-González; Manuel Marina-Breysse; Carlos Galán-Arriola; Daniel Enríquez-Vázquez; Carlos Torres; Gonzalo Pizarro; Borja Ibáñez; Rafael Peinado; Jose Luis Merino; Julián Pérez-Villacastín; José Jalife; Mariña López-Yunta; Mariano Vázquez; Jazmín Aguado-Sierra; Juan José González-Ferrer; Nicasio Pérez-Castellano; Marcos Martín-Fernández; Carlos Alberola-López; David Filgueiras-Rama Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 4.379