Literature DB >> 17530206

[Central induction area. Reduction of non-operative time without additional costs].

H Krieg1, T Schröder, J Grosse, M Hensel, T Volk, C von Heymann, K Bauer, R-W Bock, C D Spies.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Induction areas (IA) can lead to more efficient operating sessions through shortening the changeover time between patients. To date IAs have always required additional staff members, whose cost was only partly covered by improvements in productivity. The objective of this project was to demonstrate that a reduction in non-operative time through a newly introduced induction area can be achieved without a need for extra personnel.
METHODS: Non-operative time in 5,963 ENT, orthopedic and cardiac surgical patients from 8 operating theatres were studied for 1 year before and 1 year after the introduction of an induction area. The non-operative time was defined as the time between the end of surgical procedures in one operation and the start of surgical procedures in the next, within regular working hours. Through reallocation of anesthetic nursing and medical staff it was possible to introduce the induction area without increasing staff numbers.
RESULTS: Non-operative time was significantly reduced from 20 min (range 10-30 min) to 14 min (5-25 min). Subgroup analysis showed significant reductions in all specialities: from 10 min (2.5-20 min) to 5 min (0-20 min) in 1,240 cardiac surgical patients, 25 min (20-35 min) to 15 min (5-25 min) in 2,433 ENT patients and 20 min (10-30 min) to 10 min (0-20 min) in 2,290 orthopedic patients. There were no critical incidents attributable to patient handover. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: An induction area can be established and can reduce non-operative time and improve operation theatre throughput without the need for extra personnel. The efficiency of these measures will be increased when the relevant surgical organizational measures are taken to adjust to the faster anesthesiology workflow. The induction area does not lead to a higher rate of critical incidents. To what extent the induction area can be used for structured training of doctors and nurses, remains to be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17530206     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-007-1205-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  9 in total

1.  Schedule the short procedure first to improve OR efficiency.

Authors:  Philip Lebowitz
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.676

2.  Deliberate perioperative systems design improves operating room throughput.

Authors:  Warren S Sandberg; Bethany Daily; Marie Egan; James E Stahl; Julian M Goldman; Richard A Wiklund; David Rattner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Use of anesthesia induction rooms can increase the number of urgent orthopedic cases completed within 7 hours.

Authors:  Paulus M Torkki; Riitta A Marjamaa; Markus I Torkki; Pentti E Kallio; Olli A Kirvelä
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Statistical process control as a tool for monitoring nonoperative time.

Authors:  Andreas Seim; Bjørn Andersen; Warren S Sandberg
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Increasing operating room efficiency through parallel processing.

Authors:  David M Friedman; Suzanne M Sokal; Yuchiao Chang; David L Berger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Operating room design and its impact on operating room economics.

Authors:  Dan C Krupka; Warren S Sandberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.706

7.  Reorganizing patient care and workflow in the operating room: a cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  James E Stahl; Warren S Sandberg; Bethany Daily; Richard Wiklund; Marie T Egan; Julian M Goldman; Keith B Isaacson; Scott Gazelle; David W Rattner
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Analysis of efficiency of common otolaryngology operations: comparison of operating room vs short procedure room in a pediatric tertiary hospital.

Authors:  B Randall Brenn; James S Reilly; Ellen S Deutsch; Margaret H Hetrick; Steven C Cook
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-04

9.  Overlapping induction of anesthesia: an analysis of benefits and costs.

Authors:  Robert Hanss; Björn Buttgereit; Peter H Tonner; Berthold Bein; Andreas Schleppers; Markus Steinfath; Jens Scholz; Martin Bauer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

  9 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Quality of OR planning. Avoiding operating room underutilization or overutilization].

Authors:  R Grote; K Sydow; A Walleneit; D Leuchtmann; M Menzel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Process optimization in ENT: clinical pathways and central induction area].

Authors:  O Göktas; F Fleiner; C Spies; H Krieg; K Bauer; B Sedlmaier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Effects of overlapping induction on the utilization of complex operating structures: estimation using the practical application of a simulation model].

Authors:  S Bercker; R Waschipky; F Hokema; W Brecht
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  [Economic benefits of overlapping induction: investigation using a computer simulation model].

Authors:  S Hunziker; A Baumgart; C Denz; G Schüpfer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Performance development of a university operating room after implementation of a central operating room management].

Authors:  R M Waeschle; B Sliwa; M Jipp; H Pütz; J Hinz; M Bauer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Factors determining the smooth flow and the non-operative time in a one-induction room to one-operating room setting.

Authors:  Jan P Mulier; Liesje De Boeck; Michel Meulders; Jeroen Beliën; Jan Colpaert; Annabel Sels
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.431

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.