Literature DB >> 16871072

Statistical process control as a tool for monitoring nonoperative time.

Andreas Seim1, Bjørn Andersen, Warren S Sandberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Administrators need simple tools to quickly identify even small changes in the performance of perioperative systems. This applies both to established systems and to impact assessments of deliberate perioperative system design changes.
METHODS: Statistical process control was originally developed to detect nonrandom variation in manufacturing processes by continuous comparison to previous performance. The authors applied the technique to assess the nonoperative time performance between successive cases for same surgeon following themselves in a redesigned operating room. This operating room specifically implemented a new patient care pathway that improves throughput by reducing the nonoperative time. The authors tested how quickly statistical process control detected reductions in nonoperative time. They also tested the ability of statistical process control to detect successively smaller performance changes and investigated its utility for longitudinal process monitoring.
RESULTS: Statistical process control detected a clear reduction in nonoperative time after the new operating room had been used for only 2 days. The method could detect nonoperative time changes of between 5 and 10 min per case for a single operating room within one fiscal quarter. Nonoperative time for the new process was globally stable over the 31 months analyzed, but late in the analysis period, the authors detected small performance decrements, mostly attributable to factors external to the new operating room.
CONCLUSIONS: Statistical process control is useful for detecting changes in perioperative system performance, represented in this study by nonoperative time. The technique is able to detect changes quickly and to detect small changes over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16871072     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200608000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  5 in total

Review 1.  Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  James A Greenberg; Randi H Goldman
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

2.  [Statistical process control as a monitoring tool for the evaluation of reorganisation measures. Investigation in an intensive care unit].

Authors:  J Poelaert; G Schuepfer; A Umnus; M Bauer; A Schleppers
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Central induction area. Reduction of non-operative time without additional costs].

Authors:  H Krieg; T Schröder; J Grosse; M Hensel; T Volk; C von Heymann; K Bauer; R-W Bock; C D Spies
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Implementation of a Ponseti Clubfoot Program Decreases Major Surgery: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Carry; Susan Graham; Karen Whalen; Deborah Burke; Robin Baschal; Kaley S Holmes; Brian Kohuth; Gaia Georgopoulos; Nancy Hadley Miller
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-10-23

Review 5.  The Contribution of Variable Control Charts to Quality Improvement in Healthcare: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Line Slyngstad
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2021-09-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.