Jan J De Waele1, F Berrevoet2, K Reyntjens3, P Pletinckx4, I De Laet4, E Hoste4. 1. Intensive Care Unit, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium. jan.dewaele@UGent.be. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Department of Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. 4. Intensive Care Unit, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurements obtained from an intragastric Compliance catheter with the pressure measured directly in the abdominal cavity. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study in an operating room of the Ghent University Hospital PATIENTS: Seven patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. INTERVENTIONS: IAP was obtained from both an intragastric catheter and directly from the peritoneal cavity at 1-minute intervals in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy and compared using Bland-Altman analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In 156 paired measurements obtained from 7 patients the mean difference between IAPgastric and IAPref was 0.12+/-0.70 mmHg (95% CI 0.01-0.23). CONCLUSIONS: IAP measured using an intragastric Compliance catheter reliably reflects the reference IAP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
OBJECTIVE: To compare intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurements obtained from an intragastric Compliance catheter with the pressure measured directly in the abdominal cavity. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study in an operating room of the Ghent University Hospital PATIENTS: Seven patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. INTERVENTIONS: IAP was obtained from both an intragastric catheter and directly from the peritoneal cavity at 1-minute intervals in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy and compared using Bland-Altman analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In 156 paired measurements obtained from 7 patients the mean difference between IAPgastric and IAPref was 0.12+/-0.70 mmHg (95% CI 0.01-0.23). CONCLUSIONS: IAP measured using an intragastric Compliance catheter reliably reflects the reference IAP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Authors: Alexander Schachtrupp; Christian Tons; Volker Fackeldey; Joerg Hoer; Marcus Reinges; Volker Schumpelick Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-08-12 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jan J De Waele; Erik A I Billiet; Eric Hoste; Stijn I Blot; Francis A Colardyn Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-02-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Manu L N G Malbrain; Davide Chiumello; Paolo Pelosi; Alexander Wilmer; Nicola Brienza; Vincenzo Malcangi; David Bihari; Richard Innes; Jonathan Cohen; Pierre Singer; Andre Japiassu; Elizabeth Kurtop; Bart L De Keulenaer; Ronny Daelemans; Monica Del Turco; P Cosimini; Marco Ranieri; Luc Jacquet; Pierre-François Laterre; Luciano Gattinoni Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-02-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw; Ingrid E Nygaard; Tanner J Coleman; Yvonne Hsu; Marlene Egger; Robert W Hitchcock Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Joost Wauters; Liesbeth Spincemaille; Anne-Sophie Dieudonne; Kenny Van Zwam; Alexander Wilmer; Manu L N G Malbrain Journal: Crit Care Res Pract Date: 2012-02-20