Literature DB >> 11819201

Gastric tonometry and direct intraabdominal pressure monitoring in abdominal compartment syndrome.

S A Engum1, B Kogon, E Jensen, J Isch, C Balanoff, J L Grosfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) may complicate abdominal closure in patients with abdominal wall defects, abdominal trauma, intraperitoneal bleeding, and infection. Increased intraabdominal pressure (IAP) leads to respiratory compromise, organ hypoperfusion, and a high mortality rate. This study evaluates the efficacy of continuous direct monitoring of IAP and gastric tissue pH in detecting impending ACS.
METHODS: Ten mongrel puppies weighing 2.8 to 6.4 kg underwent general endotracheal anesthesia, placement of an intraabdominal inflatable balloon to simulate ACS and a Swan-Ganz catheter to measure direct IAP. A gastric tonometer, nasogastric tube, foley catheter, and arterial catheter also were inserted. Half-hourly inflation's of the intraabdominal balloon were used to simulate the development of ACS. Direct intraabdominal (IAP), gastric (GP), bladder (BP), and peak airway pressures (PAP) were measured. Gastric tonometry fluid and arterial blood gas levels were obtained during inflation, and the gastric tissue pH level was calculated. Data were statistically analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: Baseline pressures were 2 to 5 cm H(2)O in the stomach and bladder catheters, 1 to 3 mm Hg in the intraabdominal catheter, and correlated with a gastric tissue pH level of 7.4. Significantly high correlation coefficients (cc) were observed between IAP versus BP (cc, 0.77; P <.002). IAP versus GP (cc, 0.79; P <.002) and IAP versus PAP (c, 0.83; P <.0004). A high negative correlation coefficient was noted between gastric pH and IAP (cc, 0.61; P <.026). The pH level dropped to 7.0 with BP and GP of 20 cm H(2)O and IAP of 10 mm Hg, to 6.8 at 30 cm H(2)O and 20 mm Hg, and 6.5 at 40 cm H(2)O and 30 mm Hg, respectively. However, correlation coefficients between gastric tissue pH and BP, GP, or PAP were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that continuous direct intraabdominal pressure monitoring is a simple and effective method that correlates well with indirect bladder or gastric pressure measurement. Changes in gastric tissue pH in association with increased intraabdominal pressure may be an early indicator of impending abdominal compartment syndrome. These observations indicate that these techniques may be more sensitive than current methods of indirect measurement, which may be associated with delayed recognition of ACS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11819201     DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.30257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  11 in total

1.  Evaluating the effects of immediate application of negative pressure therapy after decompression from abdominal compartment syndrome in an experimental porcine model.

Authors:  S K Shah; F Jimenez; P A Walker; H Xue; T D Feeley; K S Uray; K C Norbury; R H Stewart; G A Laine; C S Cox
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Fluid vs. air for semicontinuous intra-abdominal pressure measurements using a compliance catheter.

Authors:  Jan J De Waele; Erik A I Billiet; Eric Hoste; Stijn I Blot; Francis A Colardyn
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The effect of blunt abdominal trauma on appendix vermiformis.

Authors:  B Etensel; M Yazici; H Gürsoy; S Ozkisacik; M Erkus
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Normotensive ischemic acute kidney injury as a manifestation of intra-abdominal hypertension.

Authors:  Vijaykumar Lingegowda; A Ahsan Ejaz; Puneet Sood
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  A Single-Lumen Central Venous Catheter for Continuous and Direct Intra-abdominal Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Oscar J F van Waes; Jean B Jaquet; Wim C J Hop; Marjolein J M Morak; Jan M Ijzermans; Jan Koning
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Semicontinuous intra-abdominal pressure measurement using an intragastric Compliance catheter.

Authors:  Jan J De Waele; F Berrevoet; K Reyntjens; P Pletinckx; I De Laet; E Hoste
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  The relationship between intestinal hypoperfusion and serum d-lactate levels during experimental intra-abdominal hypertension.

Authors:  Arife Polat Duzgun; Baris Gulgez; Anil Ozmutlu; Didem Ertorul; Güler Bugdayci; Nurten Akyurek; Faruk Coskun
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Commonly applied positive end-expiratory pressures do not prevent functional residual capacity decline in the setting of intra-abdominal hypertension: a pig model.

Authors:  Adrian Regli; Lisen E Hockings; Gabrielle C Musk; Brigit Roberts; Bill Noffsinger; Bhajan Singh; Peter V van Heerden
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Abdominal compartment syndrome: risk factors, diagnosis, and current therapy.

Authors:  Gina M Luckianow; Matthew Ellis; Deborah Governale; Lewis J Kaplan
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-07

10.  Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nirooshan Rooban; Adrian Regli; Wendy A Davis; Bart L De Keulenaer
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.