SUMMARY: Compared to high-impact exercises, moderate-magnitude impacts from odd-loading directions have similar ability to thicken vulnerable cortical regions of the femoral neck. Since odd-impact exercises are mechanically less demanding to the body, this type of exercise can provide a reasonable basis for devising feasible, targeted bone training against hip fragility. INTRODUCTION: Regional cortical thinning at the femoral neck is associated with hip fragility. Here, we investigated whether exercises involving high-magnitude impacts, moderate-magnitude impacts from odd directions, high-magnitude muscle forces, low-magnitude impacts at high repetition rate, or non-impact muscle forces at high repetition rate were associated with thicker femoral neck cortex. METHODS: Using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging, we scanned the proximal femur of 91 female athletes, representing the above-mentioned five exercise-loadings, and 20 referents. Cortical thickness at the inferior, anterior, superior, and posterior regions of the femoral neck was evaluated. Between-group differences were analyzed with ANCOVA. RESULTS: For the inferior cortical thickness, only the high-impact group differed significantly (approximately 60%, p = 0.012) from the reference group, while for the anterior cortex, both the high-impact and odd-impact groups differed (approximately 20%, p = 0.042 and p = 0.044, respectively). Also, the posterior cortex was approximately 20% thicker (p = 0.014 and p = 0.006, respectively) in these two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Odd-impact exercise-loading was associated, similar to high-impact exercise-loading, with approximately 20% thicker cortex around the femoral neck. Since odd-impact exercises are mechanically less demanding to the body than high-impact exercises, it is argued that this type of bone training would offer a feasible basis for targeted exercise-based prevention of hip fragility.
SUMMARY: Compared to high-impact exercises, moderate-magnitude impacts from odd-loading directions have similar ability to thicken vulnerable cortical regions of the femoral neck. Since odd-impact exercises are mechanically less demanding to the body, this type of exercise can provide a reasonable basis for devising feasible, targeted bone training against hip fragility. INTRODUCTION: Regional cortical thinning at the femoral neck is associated with hip fragility. Here, we investigated whether exercises involving high-magnitude impacts, moderate-magnitude impacts from odd directions, high-magnitude muscle forces, low-magnitude impacts at high repetition rate, or non-impact muscle forces at high repetition rate were associated with thicker femoral neck cortex. METHODS: Using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging, we scanned the proximal femur of 91 female athletes, representing the above-mentioned five exercise-loadings, and 20 referents. Cortical thickness at the inferior, anterior, superior, and posterior regions of the femoral neck was evaluated. Between-group differences were analyzed with ANCOVA. RESULTS: For the inferior cortical thickness, only the high-impact group differed significantly (approximately 60%, p = 0.012) from the reference group, while for the anterior cortex, both the high-impact and odd-impact groups differed (approximately 20%, p = 0.042 and p = 0.044, respectively). Also, the posterior cortex was approximately 20% thicker (p = 0.014 and p = 0.006, respectively) in these two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Odd-impact exercise-loading was associated, similar to high-impact exercise-loading, with approximately 20% thicker cortex around the femoral neck. Since odd-impact exercises are mechanically less demanding to the body than high-impact exercises, it is argued that this type of bone training would offer a feasible basis for targeted exercise-based prevention of hip fragility.
Authors: Paul M Mayhew; C David Thomas; John G Clement; Nigel Loveridge; Thomas J Beck; William Bonfield; Chris J Burgoyne; Jonathan Reeve Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jul 9-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jacob Uth; Therese Hornstrup; Jesper F Christensen; Karl B Christensen; Niklas R Jørgensen; Eva W Helge; Jakob F Schmidt; Klaus Brasso; Jørn W Helge; Markus D Jakobsen; Lars L Andersen; Mikael Rørth; Julie Midtgaard; Peter Krustrup Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: David A Greene; Geraldine A Naughton; Elizabeth Bradshaw; Mark Moresi; Gaele Ducher Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte Journal: Sports Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: J Uth; T Hornstrup; J F Christensen; K B Christensen; N R Jørgensen; J F Schmidt; K Brasso; M D Jakobsen; E Sundstrup; L L Andersen; M Rørth; J Midtgaard; P Krustrup; E W Helge Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Riku Nikander; Harri Sievänen; Ari Heinonen; Robin M Daly; Kirsti Uusi-Rasi; Pekka Kannus Journal: BMC Med Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 8.775