Literature DB >> 17518837

Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.

Jean-François Lemay1, Jocelyn M Lockyer, V Terri Collin, A Keith W Brownell.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Contemporary studies have shown that traditional medical school admissions interviews have strong face validity but provide evidence for only low reliability and validity. As a result, they do not provide a standardised, defensible and fair process for all applicants.
METHODS: In 2006, applicants to the University of Calgary Medical School were interviewed using the multiple mini-interview (MMI). This interview process consisted of 9, 8-minute stations where applicants were presented with scenarios they were then asked to discuss. This was followed by a single 8-minute station that allowed the applicant to discuss why he or she should be admitted to our medical school. Sociodemographic and station assessment data provided for each applicant were analysed to determine whether the MMI was a valid and reliable assessment of the non-cognitive attributes, distinguished between the non-cognitive attributes, and discriminated between those accepted and those placed on the waitlist (waiting list). We also assessed whether applicant sociodemographic characteristics were associated with acceptance or waitlist status.
RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha for each station ranged from 0.97-0.98. Low correlations between stations and the factor analysis suggest each station assessed different attributes. There were significant differences in scores between those accepted and those on the waitlist. Sociodemographic differences were not associated with status on acceptance or waiting lists. DISCUSSION: The MMI is able to assess different non-cognitive attributes and our study provides additional evidence for its reliability and validity. The MMI offers a fairer and more defensible assessment of applicants to medical school than the traditional interview.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17518837     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02767.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  33 in total

1.  Development and pilot testing of a multiple mini-interview for admission to a pharmacy degree program.

Authors:  Andrea J Cameron; Linda D Mackeigan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Evaluation of an interview process for admission into a school of pharmacy.

Authors:  Michael P Kelsch; Daniel L Friesner
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Consortium of European chiropractic educators workshop 2010.

Authors:  Martin Wangler; Claire Johnson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2010

4.  Perceptions and Cost-Analysis of a Multiple Mini-Interview in a Pharmacy School Admissions Process.

Authors:  Robin L Corelli; Michael A Muchnik; Ryan J Beechinor; Gary Fong; Eleanor M Vogt; Jennifer M Cocohoba; Candy Tsourounis; Karen Suchanek Hudmon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Development and Assessment of the Multiple Mini-Interview in a School of Pharmacy Admissions Model.

Authors:  Wendy C Cox; Jacqueline E McLaughlin; David Singer; Margaret Lewis; Melissa M Dinkins
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Application and interview features used to assess applicant qualifications for residency training.

Authors:  Allison R Butts; Kelly M Smith
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015-02

7.  Mitigating Bias in the Era of Virtual Residency and Fellowship Interviews.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Fuchs; Quentin R Youmans
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-01

8.  The Multiple Mini-Interview as an Admission Tool for a PharmD Program Satellite Campus.

Authors:  David Singer; Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Wendy C Cox
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Association of Health Sciences Reasoning Test scores with academic and experiential performance.

Authors:  Wendy C Cox; Jacqueline E McLaughlin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Multiple Mini-Interview Performance Predicts Academic Difficulty in the PharmD Curriculum.

Authors:  Seth D Heldenbrand; Schwanda K Flowers; Bryan J Bordelon; Paul O Gubbins; Catherine O'Brien; Cindy D Stowe; Bradley C Martin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.