Literature DB >> 27756929

The Multiple Mini-Interview as an Admission Tool for a PharmD Program Satellite Campus.

David Singer1, Jacqueline E McLaughlin1, Wendy C Cox1.   

Abstract

Objective. To assess the multiple mini-interview (MMI) as an admission tool for a satellite campus. Methods. In 2013, the MMI was implemented as part of a new admissions model at the UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy. From fall 2013 to spring 2015, 73 candidates were interviewed by 15 raters on the satellite campus in Asheville, North Carolina. A many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) with three facets was used to determine the variance in candidate ratings attributable to rater severity, candidate ability, and station difficulty. Candidates were surveyed to explore their perceptions of the MMI. Results. Rasch measures accounted for 48.3% of total variance in candidate scores. Rater severity accounted for 9.1% of the variance, and candidate ability accounted for 36.2% of the variance. Eighty percent of survey respondents (strongly) agreed that interviewers got to know them based on questions they answered.Conclusion. This study suggests that the MMI is a useful and valid tool for candidate selection at a satellite campus.

Keywords:  admissions; evaluation; many-facet Rasch measurement; multifaceted Rasch measurement; multiple mini-interview

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27756929      PMCID: PMC5066924          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe807121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  19 in total

1.  Academic performance in a pharmacotherapeutics course sequence taught synchronously on two campuses using distance education technology.

Authors:  Michael Steinberg; Anna K Morin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  A generalizability analysis of a veterinary school Multiple Mini Interview: effect of number of interviewers, type of interviewers, and number of stations.

Authors:  Kent Hecker; Claudio Violato
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Should candidate scores be adjusted for interviewer stringency or leniency in the multiple mini-interview?

Authors:  Chris Roberts; Imogene Rothnie; Nathan Zoanetti; Jim Crossley
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Using performance-based assessments to evaluate parity between a campus and distance education pathway.

Authors:  Thomas L Lenz; Michael S Monaghan; Amy F Wilson; Jennifer A Tilleman; Rhonda M Jones; Mary M Hayes
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 5.  The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training - a systematic review.

Authors:  Allan Pau; Kamalan Jeevaratnam; Yu Sui Chen; Abdoul Aziz Fall; Charmaine Khoo; Vishna Devi Nadarajah
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Impact of hybrid delivery of education on student academic performance and the student experience.

Authors:  Heather Brennan Congdon; Douglas A Nutter; Lisa Charneski; Peter Butko
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility.

Authors:  K Brownell; J Lockyer; T Collin; J-F Lemay
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Impact of time allocation practices on academic outcomes for students from a 2-campus pharmacy school.

Authors:  Heather Brennan Congdon; Jill A Morgan; Lisa Lebovitz
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Incorporating multiple mini-interviews in the postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residency program selection process.

Authors:  Douglas R Oyler; Kelly M Smith; E Claire Elson; Heather Bush; Aaron M Cook
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.637

10.  Does practice make perfect? The effect of coaching and retesting on selection tests used for admission to an Australian medical school.

Authors:  Barbara Griffin; David W Harding; Ian G Wilson; Neville D Yeomans
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 7.738

View more
  1 in total

1.  Using the multiple mini interview as an assessment strategy within the first year of a health professions curriculum.

Authors:  Michael D Wolcott; Jacqueline M Zeeman; Wendy C Cox; Jacqueline E McLaughlin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.463

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.