Literature DB >> 17513293

Experimental and statistical considerations to avoid false conclusions in proteomics studies using differential in-gel electrophoresis.

Natasha A Karp1, Paul S McCormick, Matthew R Russell, Kathryn S Lilley.   

Abstract

In quantitative proteomics, the false discovery rate (FDR) can be defined as the number of false positives within statistically significant changes in expression. False positives accumulate during the simultaneous testing of expression changes across hundreds or thousands of protein or peptide species when univariate tests such as the Student's t test are used. Currently most researchers rely solely on the estimation of p values and a significance threshold, but this approach may result in false positives because it does not account for the multiple testing effect. For each species, a measure of significance in terms of the FDR can be calculated, producing individual q values. The q value maintains power by allowing the investigator to achieve an acceptable level of true or false positives within the calls of significance. The q value approach relies on the use of the correct statistical test for the experimental design. In this situation, a uniform p value frequency distribution when there are no differences in expression between two samples should be obtained. Here we report a bias in p value distribution in the case of a three-dye DIGE experiment where no changes in expression are occurring. The bias was shown to arise from correlation in the data from the use of a common internal standard. With a two-dye schema, where each sample has its own internal standard, such bias was removed, enabling the application of the q value to two different proteomics studies. In the case of the first study, we demonstrate that 80% of calls of significance by the more traditional method are false positives. In the second, we show that calculating the q value gives the user control over the FDR. These studies demonstrate the power and ease of use of the q value in correcting for multiple testing. This work also highlights the need for robust experimental design that includes the appropriate application of statistical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17513293     DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M600274-MCP200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  41 in total

1.  AUTOMATED ANALYSIS OF QUANTITATIVE IMAGE DATA USING ISOMORPHIC FUNCTIONAL MIXED MODELS, WITH APPLICATION TO PROTEOMICS DATA.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Morris; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Richard C Herrick; Pietro Sanna; Howard Gutstein
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 2.  Image analysis tools and emerging algorithms for expression proteomics.

Authors:  Andrew W Dowsey; Jane A English; Frederique Lisacek; Jeffrey S Morris; Guang-Zhong Yang; Michael J Dunn
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 3.  Fluorescence two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis for biomaterial applications.

Authors:  Laura E McNamara; Matthew J Dalby; Mathis O Riehle; Richard Burchmore
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Normalization and statistical analysis of quantitative proteomics data generated by metabolic labeling.

Authors:  Lily Ting; Mark J Cowley; Seah Lay Hoon; Michael Guilhaus; Mark J Raftery; Ricardo Cavicchioli
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Multiple hypothesis testing in proteomics: a strategy for experimental work.

Authors:  Angel P Diz; Antonio Carvajal-Rodríguez; David O F Skibinski
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  The Whereabouts of 2D Gels in Quantitative Proteomics.

Authors:  Thierry Rabilloud; Cécile Lelong
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 7.  Quality assessment for clinical proteomics.

Authors:  David L Tabb
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.281

8.  Statistical model to analyze quantitative proteomics data obtained by 18O/16O labeling and linear ion trap mass spectrometry: application to the study of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis in endothelial cells.

Authors:  Inmaculada Jorge; Pedro Navarro; Pablo Martínez-Acedo; Estefanía Núñez; Horacio Serrano; Arántzazu Alfranca; Juan Miguel Redondo; Jesús Vázquez
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Pilot proteomic profile of differentially regulated proteins in right atrial appendage before and after cardiac surgery using cardioplegia and cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Richard T Clements; Gary Smejkal; Neel R Sodha; Alexander R Ivanov; John M Asara; Jun Feng; Alexander Lazarev; Shiva Gautam; Venkatachalam Senthilnathan; Kamal R Khabbaz; Cesario Bianchi; Frank W Sellke
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Highlights on the capacities of "Gel-based" proteomics.

Authors:  François Chevalier
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.480

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.