Literature DB >> 21364085

Multiple hypothesis testing in proteomics: a strategy for experimental work.

Angel P Diz1, Antonio Carvajal-Rodríguez, David O F Skibinski.   

Abstract

In quantitative proteomics work, the differences in expression of many separate proteins are routinely examined to test for significant differences between treatments. This leads to the multiple hypothesis testing problem: when many separate tests are performed many will be significant by chance and be false positive results. Statistical methods such as the false discovery rate method that deal with this problem have been disseminated for more than one decade. However a survey of proteomics journals shows that such tests are not widely implemented in one commonly used technique, quantitative proteomics using two-dimensional electrophoresis. We outline a selection of multiple hypothesis testing methods, including some that are well known and some lesser known, and present a simple strategy for their use by the experimental scientist in quantitative proteomics work generally. The strategy focuses on the desirability of simultaneous use of several different methods, the choice and emphasis dependent on research priorities and the results in hand. This approach is demonstrated using case scenarios with experimental and simulated model data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21364085      PMCID: PMC3047155          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M110.004374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  24 in total

1.  A sensible formulation of the significance test.

Authors:  L V Jones; J W Tukey
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2000-12

2.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies.

Authors:  John D Storey; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate.

Authors:  Cyril Dalmasso; Philippe Broët; Thierry Moreau
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  The ongoing tyranny of statistical significance testing in biomedical research.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Charles Poole; Oliver Kuss
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher's approach.

Authors:  M C Whitlock
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 6.  Estimation and control of multiple testing error rates for microarray studies.

Authors:  Stanley B Pounds
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.

Authors:  Stan Pounds; Cheng Cheng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Limitations of microarray studies.

Authors:  Jonathan Z Pan; Roderic G Eckenhoff; Maryellen F Eckenhoff
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Long versus short oligonucleotide microarrays for the study of gene expression in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Stephen J Walker; Yulei Wang; Kathleen A Grant; Frances Chan; Gary M Hellmann
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  2-DE profiling of GDNF overexpression-related proteome changes in differentiating ST14A rat progenitor cells.

Authors:  Raimund Hoffrogge; Susanne Beyer; Rayk Hübner; Stefan Mikkat; Eilhard Mix; Christian Scharf; Ulf Schmitz; Stefan Pauleweit; Matthias Berth; Igor Z Zubrzycki; Hilmar Christoph; Jens Pahnke; Olaf Wolkenhauer; Adelinde Uhrmacher; Uwe Völker; Arndt Rolfs
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.984

View more
  46 in total

1.  Proteomic divergence in Arabidopsis autopolyploids and allopolyploids and their progenitors.

Authors:  D W-K Ng; C Zhang; M Miller; Z Shen; S P Briggs; Z J Chen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The Whereabouts of 2D Gels in Quantitative Proteomics.

Authors:  Thierry Rabilloud; Cécile Lelong
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Secretome Dynamics in a Gram-Positive Bacterial Model.

Authors:  Konstantinos C Tsolis; Mohamed Belal Hamed; Kenneth Simoens; Joachim Koepff; Tobias Busche; Christian Rückert; Marco Oldiges; Jörn Kalinowski; Jozef Anné; Jan Kormanec; Kristel Bernaerts; Spyridoula Karamanou; Anastassios Economou
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  A Combined N-terminomics and Shotgun Proteomics Approach to Investigate the Responses of Human Cells to Rapamycin and Zinc at the Mitochondrial Level.

Authors:  Joanna Bons; Charlotte Macron; Catherine Aude-Garcia; Sebastian Alvaro Vaca-Jacome; Magali Rompais; Sarah Cianférani; Christine Carapito; Thierry Rabilloud
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Large-Scale, Ion-Current-Based Proteomic Investigation of the Rat Striatal Proteome in a Model of Short- and Long-Term Cocaine Withdrawal.

Authors:  Shichen Shen; Xiaosheng Jiang; Jun Li; Robert M Straubinger; Mauricio Suarez; Chengjian Tu; Xiaotao Duan; Alexis C Thompson; Jun Qu
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  SWATH Mass Spectrometry Performance Using Extended Peptide MS/MS Assay Libraries.

Authors:  Jemma X Wu; Xiaomin Song; Dana Pascovici; Thiri Zaw; Natasha Care; Christoph Krisp; Mark P Molloy
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 7.  Protein networks and activation of lymphocytes.

Authors:  Ynes A Helou; Arthur R Salomon
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 7.486

8.  A lipid-related metabolomic pattern of diet quality.

Authors:  Minoo Bagheri; Walter Willett; Mary K Townsend; Peter Kraft; Kerry L Ivey; Eric B Rimm; Kathryn Marie Wilson; Karen H Costenbader; Elizabeth W Karlson; Elizabeth M Poole; Oana A Zeleznik; A Heather Eliassen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Proteomic analysis of eggs from Mytilus edulis females differing in mitochondrial DNA transmission mode.

Authors:  Angel P Diz; Edward Dudley; Andrew Cogswell; Barry W MacDonald; Ellen L R Kenchington; Eleftherios Zouros; David O F Skibinski
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  The Bacterial Second Messenger Cyclic di-GMP Regulates Brucella Pathogenesis and Leads to Altered Host Immune Response.

Authors:  Mike Khan; Jerome S Harms; Fernanda M Marim; Leah Armon; Cherisse L Hall; Yi-Ping Liu; Menachem Banai; Sergio C Oliveira; Gary A Splitter; Judith A Smith
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.