Since their origins in academic endeavours in the 1970s, computational analysis tools have matured into a number of established commercial packages that underpin research in expression proteomics. In this paper we describe the image analysis pipeline for the established 2-DE technique of protein separation, and by first covering signal analysis for MS, we also explain the current image analysis workflow for the emerging high-throughput 'shotgun' proteomics platform of LC coupled to MS (LC/MS). The bioinformatics challenges for both methods are illustrated and compared, whereas existing commercial and academic packages and their workflows are described from both a user's and a technical perspective. Attention is given to the importance of sound statistical treatment of the resultant quantifications in the search for differential expression. Despite wide availability of proteomics software, a number of challenges have yet to be overcome regarding algorithm accuracy, objectivity and automation, generally due to deterministic spot-centric approaches that discard information early in the pipeline, propagating errors. We review recent advances in signal and image analysis algorithms in 2-DE, MS, LC/MS and Imaging MS. Particular attention is given to wavelet techniques, automated image-based alignment and differential analysis in 2-DE, Bayesian peak mixture models, and functional mixed modelling in MS, and group-wise consensus alignment methods for LC/MS.
Since their origins in academic endeavours in the 1970s, computational analysis tools have matured into a number of established commercial packages that underpin research in expression proteomics. In this paper we describe the image analysis pipeline for the established 2-DE technique of protein separation, and by first covering signal analysis for MS, we also explain the current image analysis workflow for the emerging high-throughput 'shotgun' proteomics platform of LC coupled to MS (LC/MS). The bioinformatics challenges for both methods are illustrated and compared, whereas existing commercial and academic packages and their workflows are described from both a user's and a technical perspective. Attention is given to the importance of sound statistn class="Chemical">ical treatment of the resultant quantifications in the search for differential expression. Despite wide availability of proteomics software, a number of challenges have yet to be overcome regarding algorithm accuracy, objectivity and automation, generally due to deterministic spot-centric approaches that discard information early in the pipeline, propagating errors. We review recent advances in signal and image analysis algorithms in 2-DE, MS, LC/MS and Imaging MS. Particular attention is given to wavelet techniques, automated image-based alignment and differential analysis in 2-DE, Bayesian peak mixture models, and functional mixed modelling in MS, and group-wise consensus alignment methods for LC/MS.
Authors: Ellen Mosleth Faergestad; Morten Rye; Beata Walczak; Lars Gidskehaug; Jens Petter Wold; Harald Grove; Xiaohong Jia; Kristin Hollung; Ulf G Indahl; Frank Westad; Frans van den Berg; Harald Martens Journal: Proteomics Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Robert A Shellie; Werner Welthagen; Jitka Zrostliková; Joachim Spranger; Michael Ristow; Oliver Fiehn; Ralf Zimmermann Journal: J Chromatogr A Date: 2005-09-09 Impact factor: 4.759
Authors: Michael Hanselmann; Ullrich Köthe; Marc Kirchner; Bernhard Y Renard; Erika R Amstalden; Kristine Glunde; Ron M A Heeren; Fred A Hamprecht Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Wiebke Timm; Alexandra Scherbart; Sebastian Böcker; Oliver Kohlbacher; Tim W Nattkemper Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2008-10-20 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Yan Zhang; Ranjeet Bhamber; Isabel Riba-Garcia; Hanqing Liao; Richard D Unwin; Andrew W Dowsey Journal: Proteomics Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Rafael A Baraúna; Alessandra Ciprandi; Agenor V Santos; Marta S P Carepo; Evonnildo C Gonçalves; Maria P C Schneider; Artur Silva Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 4.096
Authors: Carlos Fernandez-Lozano; Jose A Seoane; Marcos Gestal; Tom R Gaunt; Julian Dorado; Alejandro Pazos; Colin Campbell Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mayeli M Martínez-Aguilar; Diana I Aparicio-Bautista; Eric G Ramírez-Salazar; Juan P Reyes-Grajeda; Aldo H De la Cruz-Montoya; Bárbara Antuna-Puente; Alberto Hidalgo-Bravo; Berenice Rivera-Paredez; Paula Ramírez-Palacios; Manuel Quiterio; Margarita Valdés-Flores; Jorge Salmerón; Rafael Velázquez-Cruz Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Ashlee M Benjamin; J Will Thompson; Erik J Soderblom; Scott J Geromanos; Ricardo Henao; Virginia B Kraus; M Arthur Moseley; Joseph E Lucas Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.169