Literature DB >> 23246537

Quality assessment for clinical proteomics.

David L Tabb1.   

Abstract

Proteomics has emerged from the labs of technologists to enter widespread application in clinical contexts. This transition, however, has been hindered by overstated early claims of accuracy, concerns about reproducibility, and the challenges of handling batch effects properly. New efforts have produced sets of performance metrics and measurements of variability that establish sound expectations for experiments in clinical proteomics. As researchers begin incorporating these metrics in a quality by design paradigm, the variability of individual steps in experimental pipelines will be reduced, regularizing overall outcomes. This review discusses the evolution of quality assessment in 2D gel electrophoresis, mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling, tandem mass spectrometry-based protein inventories, and proteomic quantitation. Taken together, the advances in each of these technologies are establishing databases that will be increasingly useful for decision-making in clinical experimentation.
Copyright © 2012 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23246537      PMCID: PMC3602213          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  69 in total

1.  Direct tissue analysis using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry: practical aspects of sample preparation.

Authors:  Sarah A Schwartz; Michelle L Reyzer; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.982

2.  Platform for establishing interlaboratory reproducibility of selected reaction monitoring-based mass spectrometry peptide assays.

Authors:  A Prakash; T Rezai; B Krastins; D Sarracino; M Athanas; P Russo; M M Ross; H Zhang; Y Tian; V Kulasingam; A P Drabovich; C Smith; I Batruch; L Liotta; E Petricoin; E P Diamandis; D W Chan; M F Lopez
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Systematic evaluation of sample preparation methods for gel-based human urinary proteomics: quantity, quality, and variability.

Authors:  Visith Thongboonkerd; Somchai Chutipongtanate; Rattiyaporn Kanlaya
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Robust estimation of peptide abundance ratios and rigorous scoring of their variability and bias in quantitative shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Chongle Pan; Guruprasad Kora; David L Tabb; Dale A Pelletier; W Hayes McDonald; Gregory B Hurst; Robert L Hettich; Nagiza F Samatova
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Statistical analysis of relative labeled mass spectrometry data from complex samples using ANOVA.

Authors:  Ann L Oberg; Douglas W Mahoney; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Christopher J Malone; Russell D Wolfinger; Elizabeth G Hill; Leslie T Cooper; Oyere K Onuma; Craig Spiro; Terry M Therneau; H Robert Bergen
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Quantitative analysis of proteome coverage and recovery rates for upstream fractionation methods in proteomics.

Authors:  Yuan Fang; Dale P Robinson; Leonard J Foster
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Experimental and statistical considerations to avoid false conclusions in proteomics studies using differential in-gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  Natasha A Karp; Paul S McCormick; Matthew R Russell; Kathryn S Lilley
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Design and analysis issues in quantitative proteomics studies.

Authors:  Natasha A Karp; Kathryn S Lilley
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  SIMPATIQCO: a server-based software suite which facilitates monitoring the time course of LC-MS performance metrics on Orbitrap instruments.

Authors:  Peter Pichler; Michael Mazanek; Frederico Dusberger; Lisa Weilnböck; Christian G Huber; Christoph Stingl; Theo M Luider; Werner L Straube; Thomas Köcher; Karl Mechtler
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  The mzIdentML data standard for mass spectrometry-based proteomics results.

Authors:  Andrew R Jones; Martin Eisenacher; Gerhard Mayer; Oliver Kohlbacher; Jennifer Siepen; Simon J Hubbard; Julian N Selley; Brian C Searle; James Shofstahl; Sean L Seymour; Randall Julian; Pierre-Alain Binz; Eric W Deutsch; Henning Hermjakob; Florian Reisinger; Johannes Griss; Juan Antonio Vizcaíno; Matthew Chambers; Angel Pizarro; David Creasy
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  21 in total

1.  The 2012/2013 ABRF Proteomic Research Group Study: Assessing Longitudinal Intralaboratory Variability in Routine Peptide Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analyses.

Authors:  Keiryn L Bennett; Xia Wang; Cory E Bystrom; Matthew C Chambers; Tracy M Andacht; Larry J Dangott; Félix Elortza; John Leszyk; Henrik Molina; Robert L Moritz; Brett S Phinney; J Will Thompson; Maureen K Bunger; David L Tabb
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Optimizing High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for the Identification of Low-Abundance Post-Translational Modifications of Intact Proteins.

Authors:  Lisa E Kilpatrick; Eric L Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  Integrative biological analysis for neuropsychopharmacology.

Authors:  Mark R Emmett; Roger A Kroes; Joseph R Moskal; Charles A Conrad; Waldemar Priebe; Fernanda Laezza; Anke Meyer-Baese; Carol L Nilsson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Label-free quantification in ion mobility-enhanced data-independent acquisition proteomics.

Authors:  Ute Distler; Jörg Kuharev; Pedro Navarro; Stefan Tenzer
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  An Automated Pipeline to Monitor System Performance in Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomic Experiments.

Authors:  Michael S Bereman; Joshua Beri; Vagisha Sharma; Cory Nathe; Josh Eckels; Brendan MacLean; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 6.  A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups.

Authors:  Sheenah M Mische; Nancy C Fisher; Susan M Meyn; Katia Sol-Church; Rebecca L Hegstad-Davies; Frances Weis-Garcia; Marie Adams; John M Ashton; Kym M Delventhal; Julie A Dragon; Laura Holmes; Pratik Jagtap; Kristopher E Kubow; Christopher E Mason; Magnus Palmblad; Brian C Searle; Christoph W Turck; Kevin L Knudtson
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-04

7.  BatMass: a Java Software Platform for LC-MS Data Visualization in Proteomics and Metabolomics.

Authors:  Dmitry M Avtonomov; Alexander Raskind; Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Streaming visualisation of quantitative mass spectrometry data based on a novel raw signal decomposition method.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Ranjeet Bhamber; Isabel Riba-Garcia; Hanqing Liao; Richard D Unwin; Andrew W Dowsey
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  Clinical proteomic biomarkers: relevant issues on study design & technical considerations in biomarker development.

Authors:  Maria Frantzi; Akshay Bhat; Agnieszka Latosinska
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-29

Review 10.  Application of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Imaging Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF IMS) for Premalignant Gastrointestinal Lesions.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Ko; Chang Il Kwon; So Hye Park; Na Young Han; Hoo Keun Lee; Eun Hee Kim; Ki Baik Hahm
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.