Literature DB >> 17508199

Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity.

Bouchra Lamia1, Ana Ochagavia1, Xavier Monnet1, Denis Chemla1,2, Christian Richard1, Jean-Louis Teboul3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In hemodynamically unstable patients with spontaneous breathing activity, predicting volume responsiveness is a difficult challenge since the respiratory variation in arterial pressure cannot be used. Our objective was to test whether volume responsiveness can be predicted by the response of stroke volume measured with transthoracic echocardiography to passive leg raising in patients with spontaneous breathing activity. We also examined whether common echocardiographic indices of cardiac filling status are valuable to predict volume responsiveness in this category of patients. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Prospective study in the medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 24 patients with spontaneously breathing activity considered for volume expansion. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the response of the echocardiographic stroke volume to passive leg raising and to saline infusion (500 ml over 15 min). The left ventricular end-diastolic area and the ratio of mitral inflow E wave velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/Ea) were also measured before and after saline infusion.
RESULTS: A passive leg raising induced increase in stroke volume of 12.5% or more predicted an increase in stroke volume of 15% or more after volume expansion with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 100%. Neither left ventricular end-diastolic area nor E/Ea predicted volume responsiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: In our critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity the response of echocardiographic stroke volume to passive leg raising was a good predictor of volume responsiveness. On the other hand, the common echocardiographic markers of cardiac filling status were not valuable for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17508199     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0646-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  37 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive evaluation of hemodynamics by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  S F Nagueh
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: A comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study.

Authors:  S R Ommen; R A Nishimura; C P Appleton; F A Miller; J K Oh; M M Redfield; A J Tajik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Clinical usefulness of respiratory variations in arterial pressure.

Authors:  Sheldon Magder
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  THE CIRCULATORY RESPONSE TO A STANDARD POSTURAL CHANGE IN ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE.

Authors:  M THOMAS; J SHILLINGFORD
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1965-01

5.  A comparison of hemodynamic indices derived by invasive monitoring and two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  D M Thys; Z Hillel; M E Goldman; B P Mindich; J A Kaplan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Transthoracic echocardiography to identify or exclude cardiac cause of shock.

Authors:  Majo X Joseph; Patrick J S Disney; Rhiannon Da Costa; Stuart J Hutchison
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Thierry Boulain; Jean-Michel Achard; Jean-Louis Teboul; Christian Richard; Dominique Perrotin; Guy Ginies
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Sarah Heenen; Michael Piagnerelli; Marc Koch; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Echocardiographic and hemodynamic indexes of left ventricular preload in patients with normal and abnormal ventricular function.

Authors:  A T Cheung; J S Savino; S J Weiss; S J Aukburg; J A Berlin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Mario Rienzo; David Osman; Nadia Anguel; Christian Richard; Michael R Pinsky; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  92 in total

1.  Fluid responsiveness predicted by noninvasive bioreactance-based passive leg raise test.

Authors:  Brahim Benomar; Alexandre Ouattara; Philippe Estagnasie; Alain Brusset; Pierre Squara
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Authors:  Fabio Cavallaro; Claudio Sandroni; Cristina Marano; Giuseppe La Torre; Alice Mannocci; Chiara De Waure; Giuseppe Bello; Riccardo Maviglia; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Paul Marik; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Hemodynamic effects of passive leg raising: an echocardiographic study in patients with shock.

Authors:  Vincent Caille; Julien Jabot; Guillaume Belliard; Cyril Charron; François Jardin; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Can one predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients?

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine, 2007. II. Haemodynamics, pneumonia, infections and sepsis, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Can we use pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with ARDS?

Authors:  Jean-Yves Lefrant; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Usefulness of ultrasonographic measurement of the diameter of the inferior vena cava to predict responsiveness to intravascular fluid administration in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Silvio A Ñamendys-Silva; Juan M Arredondo-Armenta; Humberto Guevara-García; Mireya Barragán-Dessavre; Francisco J García-Guillén; Luis A Sánchez-Hurtado; Bertha Córdova-Sánchez; Andoreni R Bautista-Ocampo; Angel Herrera-Gómez; Abelardo Meneses-García
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2016-10

10.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in severe preeclamptic patients with oliguria.

Authors:  Clément Brun; Laurent Zieleskiewicz; Julien Textoris; Laurent Muller; Jean-Pierre Bellefleur; François Antonini; Maxime Tourret; Denis Ortega; Armand Vellin; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Léon Boubli; Florence Bretelle; Claude Martin; Marc Leone
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.