Bouchra Lamia1, Ana Ochagavia1, Xavier Monnet1, Denis Chemla1,2, Christian Richard1, Jean-Louis Teboul3. 1. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, EA 4046, Université Paris Sud, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. 2. Service d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, EA 4046, Université Paris Sud, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. 3. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, EA 4046, Université Paris Sud, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. jean-louis.teboul@bct.aphp.fr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In hemodynamically unstable patients with spontaneous breathing activity, predicting volume responsiveness is a difficult challenge since the respiratory variation in arterial pressure cannot be used. Our objective was to test whether volume responsiveness can be predicted by the response of stroke volume measured with transthoracic echocardiography to passive leg raising in patients with spontaneous breathing activity. We also examined whether common echocardiographic indices of cardiac filling status are valuable to predict volume responsiveness in this category of patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study in the medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 24 patients with spontaneously breathing activity considered for volume expansion. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the response of the echocardiographic stroke volume to passive leg raising and to saline infusion (500 ml over 15 min). The left ventricular end-diastolic area and the ratio of mitral inflow E wave velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/Ea) were also measured before and after saline infusion. RESULTS: A passive leg raising induced increase in stroke volume of 12.5% or more predicted an increase in stroke volume of 15% or more after volume expansion with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 100%. Neither left ventricular end-diastolic area nor E/Ea predicted volume responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In our critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity the response of echocardiographic stroke volume to passive leg raising was a good predictor of volume responsiveness. On the other hand, the common echocardiographic markers of cardiac filling status were not valuable for this purpose.
OBJECTIVE: In hemodynamically unstable patients with spontaneous breathing activity, predicting volume responsiveness is a difficult challenge since the respiratory variation in arterial pressure cannot be used. Our objective was to test whether volume responsiveness can be predicted by the response of stroke volume measured with transthoracic echocardiography to passive leg raising in patients with spontaneous breathing activity. We also examined whether common echocardiographic indices of cardiac filling status are valuable to predict volume responsiveness in this category of patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study in the medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 24 patients with spontaneously breathing activity considered for volume expansion. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the response of the echocardiographic stroke volume to passive leg raising and to saline infusion (500 ml over 15 min). The left ventricular end-diastolic area and the ratio of mitral inflow E wave velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/Ea) were also measured before and after saline infusion. RESULTS: A passive leg raising induced increase in stroke volume of 12.5% or more predicted an increase in stroke volume of 15% or more after volume expansion with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 100%. Neither left ventricular end-diastolic area nor E/Ea predicted volume responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In our critically illpatients with spontaneous breathing activity the response of echocardiographic stroke volume to passive leg raising was a good predictor of volume responsiveness. On the other hand, the common echocardiographic markers of cardiac filling status were not valuable for this purpose.
Authors: S R Ommen; R A Nishimura; C P Appleton; F A Miller; J K Oh; M M Redfield; A J Tajik Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Daniel De Backer; Sarah Heenen; Michael Piagnerelli; Marc Koch; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-03-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Xavier Monnet; Mario Rienzo; David Osman; Nadia Anguel; Christian Richard; Michael R Pinsky; Jean-Louis Teboul Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Brahim Benomar; Alexandre Ouattara; Philippe Estagnasie; Alain Brusset; Pierre Squara Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Fabio Cavallaro; Claudio Sandroni; Cristina Marano; Giuseppe La Torre; Alice Mannocci; Chiara De Waure; Giuseppe Bello; Riccardo Maviglia; Massimo Antonelli Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Vincent Caille; Julien Jabot; Guillaume Belliard; Cyril Charron; François Jardin; Antoine Vieillard-Baron Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Silvio A Ñamendys-Silva; Juan M Arredondo-Armenta; Humberto Guevara-García; Mireya Barragán-Dessavre; Francisco J García-Guillén; Luis A Sánchez-Hurtado; Bertha Córdova-Sánchez; Andoreni R Bautista-Ocampo; Angel Herrera-Gómez; Abelardo Meneses-García Journal: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) Date: 2016-10