Literature DB >> 11023933

Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: A comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study.

S R Ommen1, R A Nishimura, C P Appleton, F A Miller, J K Oh, M M Redfield, A J Tajik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive assessment of diastolic filling by Doppler echocardiography provides important information about left ventricular (LV) status in selected subsets of patients. This study was designed to assess whether mitral annular velocities as assessed by tissue Doppler imaging are associated with invasive measures of diastolic LV performance and whether additional information is gained over traditional Doppler variables. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients referred for cardiac catheterization underwent simultaneous Doppler interrogation. Invasive measurements of LV pressures were obtained with micromanometer-tipped catheters, and the mean LV diastolic pressure (M-LVDP) was used as a surrogate for mean left atrial pressure. Doppler signals from the mitral inflow, pulmonary venous inflow, and TDI of the mitral annulus were obtained. Isolated parameters of transmitral flow correlated with M-LVDP only when ejection fraction <50%. The ratio of mitral velocity to early diastolic velocity of the mitral annulus (E/E') showed a better correlation with M-LVDP than did other Doppler variables for all levels of systolic function. E/E' <8 accurately predicted normal M-LVDP, and E/E' >15 identified increased M-LVDP. Wide variability was present in those with E/E' of 8 to 15. A subset of those patients with E/E' 8 to 15 could be further defined by use of other Doppler data.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of tissue Doppler imaging of the mitral annulus and mitral inflow velocity curves provides better estimates of LV filling pressures than other methods (pulmonary vein, preload reduction). However, accurate prediction of filling pressures for an individual patient requires a stepwise approach incorporating all available data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11023933     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.15.1788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  648 in total

1.  Diastolic wall strain as a predictor of age-related cardiovascular events in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Satoshi Tsujimoto; Yoko Miyasaka; Yoshinobu Suwa; Naoki Taniguchi; Shoko Kittaka; Kazuhiro Yamamoto; Ichiro Shiojima
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Reference values for echocardiographic parameters and indexes of left ventricular function in healthy, young adult sheep used in translational research: comparison with standardized values in humans.

Authors:  Paola Locatelli; Fernanda D Olea; Andrea De Lorenzi; Fabián Salmo; Gustavo L Vera Janavel; Anna P Hnatiuk; Eduardo Guevara; Alberto J Crottogini
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2011-10-22

Review 3.  Quantitative assessment of the pressure and volume overloaded right ventricle: imaging is a real challenge.

Authors:  I I Tulevski; H Romkes; A Dodge-Khatami; E E van der Wall; M Groenink; D J van Veldhuisen; B J M Mulder
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Clinical assessment of left ventricular diastolic function.

Authors:  Derek G Gibson; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with Doppler tissue imaging: effects of preload and place of measurements.

Authors:  Irem Dincer; Deniz Kumbasar; Gökhan Nergisoglu; Yusuf Atmaca; Sim Kutlay; Omer Akyurek; Tamer Sayin; Cetin Erol; Dervis Oral
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  A clinical approach to the assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by Doppler echocardiography: update 2003.

Authors:  S R Ommen; R A Nishimura
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  The utility of newly derived Doppler echocardiographic variables in the diagnosis and management of patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Andrew D Feingold; Dennis A Tighe; Gerard P Aurigemma; Jeffrey C Hill; Craig S Vinch
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of intracardiac filling pressure in decompensated patients with advanced systolic heart failure.

Authors:  Wilfried Mullens; Allen G Borowski; Ronan J Curtin; James D Thomas; W H Tang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  [Assessment of diastolic heart failure. Current role of echocardiography].

Authors:  F Weidemann; M Niemann; S Herrmann; G Ertl; S Störk
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Predictors of non-pulmonary vein foci in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Keita Watanabe; Junichi Nitta; Osamu Inaba; Akira Sato; Yukihiro Inamura; Nobutaka Kato; Masahito Suzuki; Masahiko Goya; Kenzo Hirao; Tetsuo Sasano
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.