Literature DB >> 17503226

Outcomes in adults implanted with the FLEXsoft electrode.

Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner1, Alexandra Jappel, Constantino Morera, Wolfgang Gstöttner, Joachim Müller, Jan Kiefer, Paul Van De Heyning, Ilona Anderson, Stefan Bryde Nielsen.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: Achieving deep insertions, as well as good speech perception results, the FLEXsoft electrode array allows for some preservation in subjects with measurable low frequency hearing, even after a period of time. This opens the door for future research in electrode design, hearing preservation research and drug delivery systems.
OBJECTIVES: The FLEXsoft electrode is designed to be atraumatic to the structures of the cochlea during deep insertion of a cochlear implant electrode. This paper reports on the surgical and functional outcomes in implantations with the FLEXsoft electrode array. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three adult subjects received a FLEXsoft electrode array and were assessed on speech perception tests (monosyllables, sentences in quiet and in noise), a subjective questionnaire (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire) and a pure-tone audiogram. Results at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post first fitting were compared to scores from the preoperative interval.
RESULTS: Surgery was uneventful in all cases, the surgical handling was satisfactory and correct position of the electrode was achieved in all cases. Hearing could be preserved (as determined by the audiogram) in half of the subjects who had measurable audiograms preoperatively at the 1 month test interval, and in a quarter of subjects after 12 months of device use, despite deep insertion of the electrode. Speech perception scores showed significant improvement over time, as did quality of life scores, and were comparable to results with the standard electrode array as used in the COMBI 40+ and PULSARCI100.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17503226     DOI: 10.1080/00016480600987784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  15 in total

1.  [Intracochlear electrode position: evaluation after deep insertion using cone beam computed tomography].

Authors:  C Güldner; R Weiss; B Eivazi; S Bien; J A Werner; I Diogo
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

3.  Deep round window insertion versus standard approach in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Karl Fredrik Nordfalk; Kjell Rasmussen; Marie Bunne; Greg Eigner Jablonski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Influence of cochleostomy and cochlear implant insertion on drug gradients following intratympanic application in Guinea pigs.

Authors:  E B King; J J Hartsock; S J O'Leary; A N Salt
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Jon K Shallop; Sarah A Sydlowski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Electric and Acoustic Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Christopher Welch; Margaret T Dillon; Harold C Pillsbury
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

7.  Vestibular Preservation After Cochlear Implantation Using the Round Window Approach.

Authors:  Keita Tsukada; Shin-Ichi Usami
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Achievement of hearing preservation in the presence of an electrode covering the residual hearing region.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Usami; Hideaki Moteki; Nobuyoshi Suzuki; Hisakuni Fukuoka; Maiko Miyagawa; Shin-Ya Nishio; Yutaka Takumi; Satoshi Iwasaki; Claude Jolly
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  The Reality of Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: Who Is Utilizing EAS?

Authors:  Elizabeth Perkins; Jaclyn Lee; Nauman Manzoor; Matthew O'Malley; Marc Bennett; Robert Labadie; Alejandro Rivas; David Haynes; René Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr; Sid P Bacon; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.