Literature DB >> 24008355

Influence of cochleostomy and cochlear implant insertion on drug gradients following intratympanic application in Guinea pigs.

E B King1, J J Hartsock, S J O'Leary, A N Salt.   

Abstract

Locally applied drugs can protect residual hearing following cochlear implantation. The influence of cochlear implantation on drug levels in the scala tympani (ST) after round window application was investigated in guinea pigs using the marker trimethylphenylammonium (TMPA) measured in real time with TMPA-selective microelectrodes. TMPA concentration in the upper basal turn of the ST rapidly increased during implantation and then declined due to cerebrospinal fluid entering the ST at the cochlear aqueduct and exiting at the cochleostomy. The TMPA increase was found to be caused by the cochleostomy drilling if the burr tip partially entered the ST. TMPA distribution in the second turn was less affected by implantation procedures. These findings show that basal turn drug levels may be changed during implantation and the changes may need to be considered in the interpretation of therapeutic effects of drugs in conjunction with implantation.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24008355      PMCID: PMC3872819          DOI: 10.1159/000353534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  36 in total

1.  Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Jan Kiefer; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Wolfgang Baumgartner; Stephan Marcel Pok; Jochen Tillein; Qing Ye; Christoph von Ilberg
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss after drill-generated acoustic trauma in tympanoplasty.

Authors:  J Doménech; M Carulla; J Traserra
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1989

3.  Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss.

Authors:  C von Ilberg; J Kiefer; J Tillein; T Pfenningdorff; R Hartmann; E Stürzebecher; R Klinke
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Volume flow rate of perilymph in the guinea-pig cochlea.

Authors:  K Ohyama; A N Salt; R Thalmann
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique].

Authors:  E Lehnhardt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Perilymph pharmacokinetics of markers and dexamethasone applied and sampled at the lateral semi-circular canal.

Authors:  Alec N Salt; Jared J Hartsock; Ruth M Gill; Fabrice Piu; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-12

7.  Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Oliver Adunka; Jan Kiefer; Marc H Unkelbach; Thomas Lehnert; Wolfgang Gstoettner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery.

Authors:  P Kylén; S Arlinger
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials.

Authors:  Megan J Foggia; Rene Vielman Quevedo; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.