Literature DB >> 22767189

[Intracochlear electrode position: evaluation after deep insertion using cone beam computed tomography].

C Güldner1, R Weiss, B Eivazi, S Bien, J A Werner, I Diogo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Due to the increasing number of cochlear implantations (CI), postoperative radiological verification of the electrode position, e.g., with respect to quality control, plays a central role. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intracochlear position of deep inserted electrodes by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT data sets (Accu-I-tomo, Morita, Kyoto, Japan) of 22 patients (28 ears operated between 2008 and 2011) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent a CI (round window approach) with deep insertion of the electrode (Flex soft or standard electrode from MedEl©). CBCT data were analyzed for intracochlear position of the electrode (scala vestibuli, scala tympani, malposition between the scalae) and the certainty of this evaluation.
RESULTS: All ears could be evaluated with the status certain or relatively certain in the basal turn of the cochlea. Thereby, the electrode array was inserted into the scala tympani in 93% (n = 26). Primary insertion into the scala vestibuli and the scala media was observed in 3.5% of the ears, respectively. In the apical part of the cochlea, only 32% (n = 9 ears) could be evaluated with relative certainty. The remaining 68% of cases could not be evaluated. Of the 32% interpretable cases in the apical part of the cochlea, 25% (n = 7) were inserted into the scala tympani, 3.5% (n = 1) into the scala vestibuli, and 3.5% (n = 1) were malpositioned between the scalae.
CONCLUSION: The exact evaluation of the intracochlear position of the electrode by CBCT is only possible in the basal turn of the cochlea. In deep insertion, determination of the position in the medial and apical parts of the cochlea by CBCT is still not possible. Furthermore, the round window approach allows reliable implantation into the scala tympani.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22767189     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-012-2527-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  23 in total

1.  Scala vestibuli insertion in cochlear implantation: a valuable alternative for cases with obstructed scala tympani.

Authors:  J Kiefer; A Weber; T Pfennigdorff; C von Ilberg
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.538

2.  The value of digital volume tomography in assessing the position of cochlear implant arrays in temporal bone specimens.

Authors:  Thiemo Kurzweg; Carsten V Dalchow; Martin Bremke; Omid Majdani; Ingo Kureck; Reinald Knecht; Jochen A Werner; Afshin Teymoortash
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Flat-panel volume computed tomography for cochlear implant electrode array examination in isolated temporal bone specimens.

Authors:  Soenke H Bartling; Rajiv Gupta; Attila Torkos; Christian Dullin; Grabbe Eckhardt; Thomas Lenarz; Hartmut Becker; Timo Stöver
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: a cadaveric validation study comparing 64-slice multidetector computed tomography with microcomputed tomography.

Authors:  John I Lane; Colin L W Driscoll; Robert J Witte; Andrew Primak; Edward P Lindell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Temporal bone imaging: comparison of flat panel volume CT and multisection CT.

Authors:  O Majdani; K Thews; S Bartling; M Leinung; C Dalchow; R Labadie; T Lenarz; G Heidrich
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Artifacts of the electrode in cochlea implantation and limits in analysis of deep insertion in cone beam tomography (CBT).

Authors:  C Güldner; S Wiegand; R Weiss; S Bien; A Sesterhenn; A Teymoortash; I Diogo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Margaret W Skinner; Lawrence T Cohen; Patricia A Leake; Chris James; Colette Boëx; Timothy A Holden; Charles C Finley; Peter S Roland; J Thomas Roland; Matt Haller; Jim F Patrick; Claude N Jolly; Mike A Faltys; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique].

Authors:  E Lehnhardt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  [Cochlear implantation: a changing indication].

Authors:  T Stark; S Helbig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  [Unilateral deafness and cochlear implantation: audiological diagnostic evaluation and outcomes].

Authors:  S Arndt; R Laszig; A Aschendorff; R Beck; C Schild; F Hassepass; G Ihorst; S Kroeger; P Kirchem; T Wesarg
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cone-beam CT versus Multidetector CT in Postoperative Cochlear Implant Imaging: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.

Authors:  R A Helal; R Jacob; M A Elshinnawy; A I Othman; I M Al-Dhamari; D W Paulus; T T Abdelaziz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Indications of cone beam CT in head and neck imaging in children.

Authors:  U Walliczek-Dworschak; I Diogo; L Strack; M Mandapathil; A Teymoortash; J A Werner; C Güldner
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.124

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.