Literature DB >> 17494703

Changes in human muscle spindle sensitivity during a proprioceptive attention task.

Valérie Hospod1, Jean-Marc Aimonetti, Jean-Pierre Roll, Edith Ribot-Ciscar.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test whether fusimotor control of human muscle spindle sensitivity changed when attention was selectively directed to the recognition of an imposed two-dimensional movement in the form of a written symbol. The unitary activities of 32 muscle spindle afferents (26 Ia, 6 II) were recorded by microneurography at the level of the common peroneal nerve. The patterns of firing rate in response to passive movements of the ankle, forming different letters or numbers, were compared in two conditions: control and recognition. No visual cues were given in either condition, but subjects had to recognize and name the character in one condition compared with not paying attention in the control condition. The results showed that 58% of the tested Ia afferents presented modified responses to movements when these had to be recognized. Changes in Ia afferent responses included decreased depth of modulation, increased variability of discharge, and changes in spontaneous activity. Not all changes were evident in the same afferent. Furthermore, the percentage of correctly recognized movements amounted to 63% when changes were observed, but it was only 48% when the primary ending sensitivity was unaltered. The responses of group II afferents were only weakly changed or unchanged. It is suggested that the altered muscle spindle sensitivity is because of selective changes in fusimotor control, the consequence of which might be to feed the brain movement trajectory information that is more accurate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17494703      PMCID: PMC6672388          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0572-07.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  30 in total

1.  Modulation of primary afferent discharge by dynamic and static gamma motor axons in cat muscle spindles in relation to the intrafusal fibre types activated.

Authors:  R Durbaba; A Taylor; P H Ellaway; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Increased muscle spindle sensitivity to movement during reinforcement manoeuvres in relaxed human subjects.

Authors:  E Ribot-Ciscar; C Rossi-Durand; J P Roll
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Distinctive patterns of static and dynamic gamma motor activity during locomotion in the decerebrate cat.

Authors:  A Taylor; P H Ellaway; R Durbaba; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Stochastic resonance in muscle receptors.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Richard W Carr; David L Morgan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  "Proprioceptive signature" of cursive writing in humans: a multi-population coding.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Roll; Frédéric Albert; Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Mikael Bergenheim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The influence of the gamma system on cross-correlated activity of Ia muscle spindles and its relation to information transmission.

Authors:  G Inbar; J Madrid; P Rudomín
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Ia afferent activity during a variety of voluntary movements in the cat.

Authors:  A Prochazka; R A Westerman; S P Ziccone
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Proprioceptive population coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans: I. Muscle spindle feedback during spatially oriented movements.

Authors:  M Bergenheim; E Ribot-Ciscar; J P Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Electrodermal responses: what happens in the brain.

Authors:  Hugo D Critchley
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.519

10.  The classification of afferents from muscle spindles of the jaw-closing muscles of the cat.

Authors:  A Taylor; R Durbaba; J F Rodgers
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  25 in total

1.  Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Jean-Pierre Roll; Valérie Hospod; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Natural error patterns enable transfer of motor learning to novel contexts.

Authors:  Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Noise-enhanced kinaesthesia: a psychophysical and microneurographic study.

Authors:  Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Valérie Hospod; Jean-Marc Aimonetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatially selective enhancement of proprioceptive acuity following motor learning.

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Elizabeth T Wilson; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Can proprioceptive training improve motor learning?

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Dinant A Kistemaker; Alvin Chin; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effects of White Noise Achilles Tendon Vibration on Quiet Standing and Active Postural Positioning.

Authors:  Carly C Sacco; Erin M Gaffney; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  Dynamic scapular recognition exercise improves scapular upward rotation and shoulder pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ayman A Mohamed; Yih-Kuen Jan; Wadida H El Sayed; Mohamed E Abdel Wanis; Abeer A Yamany
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-06-14

8.  Altered visual strategies and attention are related to increased force fluctuations during a pinch grip task in older adults.

Authors:  Kevin G Keenan; Wendy E Huddleston; Bradley E Ernest
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Sensory inflow manipulation induces learning-like phenomena in motor behavior.

Authors:  Samuele Contemori; Cristina V Dieni; Jacqueline A Sullivan; Aldo Ferraresi; Chiara Occhigrossi; Francesco Calabrese; Vito E Pettorossi; Andrea Biscarini; Roberto Panichi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Vibrotactile cuing revisited to reveal a possible challenge to sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Timothy A Thrasher; Charles S Layne; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.