Literature DB >> 15007582

"Proprioceptive signature" of cursive writing in humans: a multi-population coding.

Jean-Pierre Roll1, Frédéric Albert, Edith Ribot-Ciscar, Mikael Bergenheim.   

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to investigate the firing behavior of populations of muscle spindle afferents in all the muscles acting on the ankle while this joint was being subjected to "writing-like" movements. First it was proposed to determine whether the ensemble of muscle spindles give rise to a unique, specific, and reproducible feedback information characterizing each letter, number or short word. Secondly, we analyzed how the proprioceptive feedback on the whole encodes the spatial and temporal characteristics of writing movements using the "vector population model". The unitary activity of 51 primary and secondary muscle spindle afferents was recorded in the tibial and common peroneal nerves at the level of the popliteal fossea, using the microneurographic method. The units recorded from belonged to the tibialis anterior, the extensor digitorum longus, the extensor hallucis longus, the peroneus lateralis, the gastrocnemius-soleus and the tibialis posterior muscles. The "writing-like" movements were randomly imposed at a "natural" velocity via a computer-controlled machine in a two-dimensional space. In general, muscle spindle afferents from any of the six muscles responded according to the tuning properties of the parent muscle, i.e. increasing their discharge rate during the phases where the direction of movement was within the preferred sensory sector of the parent muscle. The whole trajectory of the writing movements was coded in turn by the activity of Ia afferents arising from all the muscles acting on the joint. Both single afferent responses and population responses were found to be highly specific and reproducible with each graphic sign. The complex multi-muscle afferent pattern involved, with its timing and distribution in the muscle space, seems to constitute a true "proprioceptive signature" for each graphic symbol. The ensemble of muscle spindle afferents were therefore found to encode the instantaneous direction and velocity of writing movements remarkably accurately. It was concluded that the proprioceptive feedback from all the muscles with which the moving joint is equipped provides the CNS with highly specific information that might contribute to a graphic sign identification process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15007582     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1853-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Proprioceptive control of multijoint movement: bimanual circle drawing.

Authors:  S M Verschueren; S P Swinnen; P J Cordo; N V Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Proprioceptive population coding of limb position in humans.

Authors:  Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Mikael Bergenheim; Frédéric Albert; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The preferred sensory direction of muscle spindle primary endings influences the velocity coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans.

Authors:  Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Mikael Bergenheim; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effects of prior antagonist muscle vibration on performance of rapid movements.

Authors:  S Radovanović; S Jarić; S Milanović; I Vukcević; M Ljubisavljević; R Anastasijević
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjects.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; K E Hagbarth
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Propriomuscular coding of kinaesthetic sensation. Experimental approach and mathematical modelling.

Authors:  J C Gilhodes; Y Coiton; J P Roll; B Ans
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  [Simulation of neuronal networks (SIRENE). II. Hypothesis for decoding the message of movement carried by spindle afferences IA and II by a mechanism of synaptic plasticity].

Authors:  B Ans; J C Gilhodes; J Hérault
Journal:  C R Seances Acad Sci III       Date:  1983

Review 9.  Arm trajectory and representation of movement processing in motor cortical activity.

Authors:  A B Schwartz; D W Moran
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in man.

Authors:  J C Gilhodes; J P Roll; M F Tardy-Gervet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

1.  Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Jean-Pierre Roll; Valérie Hospod; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vibrotactile stimulation of fast-adapting cutaneous afferents from the foot modulates proprioception at the ankle joint.

Authors:  Robyn L Mildren; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-01-28

3.  Proprioceptive feedback in humans expresses motor invariants during writing.

Authors:  Frederic Albert; Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Michel Fiocchi; Mikael Bergenheim; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Ia afferent feedback of a given movement evokes the illusion of the same movement when returned to the subject via muscle tendon vibration.

Authors:  Frederic Albert; Mikael Bergenheim; Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Changes in human muscle spindle sensitivity during a proprioceptive attention task.

Authors:  Valérie Hospod; Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Jean-Pierre Roll; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Where is your arm? Variations in proprioception across space and tasks.

Authors:  Christina T Fuentes; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Three tools for the real-time simulation of embodied spiking neural networks using GPUs.

Authors:  Andreas K Fidjeland; David Gamez; Murray P Shanahan; Edgars Lazdins
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-07

8.  A new vibrator to stimulate muscle proprioceptors in fMRI.

Authors:  Marie Montant; Patricia Romaiguère; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Functional changes in muscle afferent neurones in an osteoarthritis model: implications for impaired proprioceptive performance.

Authors:  Qi Wu; James L Henry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An Assessment of Six Muscle Spindle Models for Predicting Sensory Information during Human Wrist Movements.

Authors:  Puja Malik; Nuha Jabakhanji; Kelvin E Jones
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.