Literature DB >> 22972960

Can proprioceptive training improve motor learning?

Jeremy D Wong1, Dinant A Kistemaker, Alvin Chin, Paul L Gribble.   

Abstract

Recent work has investigated the link between motor learning and sensory function in arm movement control. A number of findings are consistent with the idea that motor learning is associated with systematic changes to proprioception (Haith A, Jackson C, Mial R, Vijayakumar S. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 21: 593-600, 2008; Ostry DJ, Darainy M, Mattar AA, Wong J, Gribble PL. J Neurosci 30: 5384-5393, 2010; Vahdat S, Darainy M, Milner TE, Ostry DJ. J Neurosci 31: 16907-16915, 2011). Here, we tested whether motor learning could be improved by providing subjects with proprioceptive training on a desired hand trajectory. Subjects were instructed to reproduce both the time-varying position and velocity of novel, complex hand trajectories. Subjects underwent 3 days of training with 90 movement trials per day. Active movement trials were interleaved with demonstration trials. For control subjects, these interleaved demonstration trials consisted of visual demonstration alone. A second group of subjects received visual and proprioceptive demonstration simultaneously; this group was presented with the same visual stimulus, but, in addition, their limb was moved through the target trajectory by a robot using servo control. Subjects who experienced the additional proprioceptive demonstration of the desired trajectory showed greater improvements during training movements than control subjects who only received visual information. This benefit of adding proprioceptive training was seen in both movement speed and position error. Interestingly, additional control subjects who received proprioceptive guidance while actively moving their arm during demonstration trials did not show the same improvement in positional accuracy. These findings support the idea that the addition of proprioceptive training can augment motor learning, and that this benefit is greatest when the subject passively experiences the goal movement.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22972960      PMCID: PMC3544879          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00122.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  34 in total

1.  Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception.

Authors:  Antonino Casile; Martin A Giese
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Retention characteristics of motor short-term memory cues.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Velocity-dependent suppression of somatosensory evoked potentials during movement.

Authors:  R Rauch; R W Angel; C C Boylls
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-11

4.  Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Nguyet; L G Cohen; J P Brasil-Neto; A Cammarota; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice.

Authors:  J Classen; J Liepert; S P Wise; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Sensori-sensory afferent conditioning with leg movement: gain control in spinal reflex and ascending paths.

Authors:  J D Brooke; J Cheng; D F Collins; W E McIlroy; J E Misiaszek; W R Staines
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Functionally specific changes in resting-state sensorimotor networks after motor learning.

Authors:  Shahabeddin Vahdat; Mohammad Darainy; Theodore E Milner; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Use-dependent and error-based learning of motor behaviors.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Olivier White; Darren Newman; Níall Lally
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Learning to perform a new movement with robotic assistance: comparison of haptic guidance and visual demonstration.

Authors:  J Liu; S C Cramer; D J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Haptic guidance improves the visuo-manual tracking of trajectories.

Authors:  Jérémy Bluteau; Sabine Coquillart; Yohan Payan; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  43 in total

1.  Perceptual learning in sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Mohammad Darainy; Shahabeddin Vahdat; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Proprioception in motor learning: lessons from a deafferented subject.

Authors:  N Yousif; J Cole; J Rothwell; J Diedrichsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Investigating three types of continuous auditory feedback in visuo-manual tracking.

Authors:  Éric O Boyer; Frédéric Bevilacqua; Patrick Susini; Sylvain Hanneton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Somatosensory perceptual training enhances motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Heather R McGregor; Joshua G A Cashaback; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Predicting non-linear dynamics by stable local learning in a recurrent spiking neural network.

Authors:  Aditya Gilra; Wulfram Gerstner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Structure of plasticity in human sensory and motor networks due to perceptual learning.

Authors:  Shahabeddin Vahdat; Mohammad Darainy; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Dynamic scapular recognition exercise improves scapular upward rotation and shoulder pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ayman A Mohamed; Yih-Kuen Jan; Wadida H El Sayed; Mohamed E Abdel Wanis; Abeer A Yamany
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-06-14

8.  Foot placement control and gait instability among people with stroke.

Authors:  Jesse C Dean; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2015

9.  The effect of proprioceptive acuity variability on motor adaptation in older adults.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Sensory inflow manipulation induces learning-like phenomena in motor behavior.

Authors:  Samuele Contemori; Cristina V Dieni; Jacqueline A Sullivan; Aldo Ferraresi; Chiara Occhigrossi; Francesco Calabrese; Vito E Pettorossi; Andrea Biscarini; Roberto Panichi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.