Literature DB >> 17494653

3D digital subtraction angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of flat panel detector with conventional image intensifier TV system using a vascular phantom.

S Kakeda1, Y Korogi, N Ohnari, Y Hatakeyama, J Moriya, N Oda, K Nishino, W Miyamoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Compared with the image intensifier (I.I.)-TV system, the flat panel detector (FPD) system of direct conversion type has several theoretic advantages, such as higher spatial resolution, wide dynamic range, and no image distortion. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of 3D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the FPD and conventional I.I.-TV systems using a vascular phantom.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic vascular phantom was designed to simulate the various intracranial aneurysms with aneurysmal bleb. The tubes of this vascular phantom were filled with 2 concentrations of contrast material (300 and 150 mg I/mL), and we obtained 3D DSA using the FPD and I.I.-TV systems. First, 2 blinded radiologists compared the volume-rendering images for 3D DSA on the FPD and I.I.-TV systems, looking for pseudostenosis artifacts. Then, 2 other radiologists independently evaluated both systems for the depiction of the simulated aneurysm and aneurysmal bleb using a 5-point scale.
RESULTS: For the degree of the pseudostenosis artifacts at the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery at 300 mg I/mL, 3D DSA with FPD system showed mild stenoses, whereas severe stenoses were observed at 3D DSA with I.I.-TV system. At both concentrations, the FPD system was significantly superior to I.I.-TV system regarding the depiction of aneurysm and aneurysmal bleb.
CONCLUSION: Compared with the I.I.-TV system, the FPD system could create high-resolution 3D DSA combined with a reduction of the pseudostenosis artifacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17494653      PMCID: PMC8134332     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  10 in total

Review 1.  Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics.

Authors:  H G Chotas; J T Dobbins; C E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique.

Authors:  C D Marcus; V J Ladam-Marcus; J L Bigot; C Clement; B Baehrel; B P Menanteau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; W G Ji; Anne Debrie; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: a photoinduced discharge readout method for digital mammography.

Authors:  J A Rowlands; D M Hunter; N Araj
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment.

Authors:  R Anxionnat; S Bracard; X Ducrocq; Y Trousset; L Launay; E Kerrien; M Braun; R Vaillant; F Scomazzoni; A Lebedinsky; L Picard
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Takeshi Sugahara; Yukunori Korogi; Kouji Nakashima; Satoshi Hamatake; Shin Honda; Mutsumasa Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Three-dimensional reconstructed images after rotational angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: surgical correlation.

Authors:  S Tanoue; H Kiyosue; H Kenai; T Nakamura; M Yamashita; H Mori
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  3D angiography. Clinical interest. First applications in interventional neuroradiology.

Authors:  R Anxionnat; S Bracard; J Macho; E Da Costa; R Vaillant; L Launay; Y Trousset; R Romeas; L Picard
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.447

9.  Pseudostenosis phenomenon at volume-rendered three-dimensional digital angiography of intracranial arteries: frequency, location, and effect on image evaluation.

Authors:  Toshinori Hirai; Yukunori Korogi; Ken Ono; Masayuki Yamura; Shozaburo Uemura; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Clinical usefulness of unsubtracted 3D digital angiography compared with rotational digital angiography in the pretreatment evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Toshinori Hirai; Yukunori Korogi; Kenji Suginohara; Ken Ono; Tomohiro Nishi; Shozaburo Uemura; Masayuki Yamura; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  A comparison between magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Teslas (time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced) and flat-panel digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of embolized brain aneurysms.

Authors:  Guilherme S Nakiri; Antonio C Santos; Thiago G Abud; Davi C Aragon; Benedicto O Colli; Daniel G Abud
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Ultra-low-dose computed tomography system with a flat panel detector: assessment of radiation dose reduction and spatial and low contrast resolution.

Authors:  Yukihiro Nagatani; Norihisa Nitta; Masashi Takahashi; Noriaki Tezuka; Yasutaka Nakano; Mitsuru Ikeda; Yuki Kirino; Keiji Hashimoto; Hideji Otani; Yoko Murakami; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2009-01-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.