Literature DB >> 12607843

Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.

Wei Zhao1, W G Ji, Anne Debrie, J A Rowlands.   

Abstract

Our work is to investigate and understand the factors affecting the imaging performance of amorphous selenium (a-Se) flat-panel detectors for digital mammography. Both theoretical and experimental methods were developed to investigate the spatial frequency dependent detective quantum efficiency [DQE(f)] of a-Se flat-panel detectors for digital mammography. Since the K edge of a-Se is 12.66 keV and within the energy range of a mammographic spectrum, a theoretical model was developed based on cascaded linear system analysis with parallel processes to take into account the effect of K fluorescence on the modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and DQE(f) of the detector. This model was used to understand the performance of a small-area prototype detector with 85 microm pixel size. The presampling MTF, NPS, and DQE(f) of the prototype were measured, and compared to the theoretical calculation of the model. The calculation showed that K fluorescence accounted for a 15% reduction in the MTF at the Nyquist frequency (fNy) of the prototype detector, and the NPS at fNy was reduced to 89% of that at zero spatial frequency. The measurement of presampling MTF of the prototype detector revealed an additional source of blurring, which was attributed to charge trapping in the blocking layer at the interface between a-Se and the active matrix. This introduced a drop in both presampling MTF and NPS at high spatial frequency, and reduced aliasing in the NPS. As a result, the DQE(f) of the prototype detector at fNy approached 40% of that at zero spatial frequency. The measured and calculated DQE(f) using the linear system model have reasonable agreement, indicating that the factors controlling image quality in a-Se based mammographic detectors are fully understood, and the model can be used to further optimize detector imaging performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12607843     DOI: 10.1118/1.1538233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  28 in total

1.  Effect of repeated x-ray exposure on the resolution of amorphous selenium based x-ray imagers.

Authors:  M Z Kabir; L Chowdhury; G DeCrescenzo; O Tousignant; S O Kasap; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A method for the determination of the two-dimensional MTF of digital radiography systems using only the noise response.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2010-03-23

Review 3.  Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges.

Authors:  A Noel; F Thibault
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Investigation of the signal behavior at diagnostic energies of prototype, direct detection, active matrix, flat-panel imagers incorporating polycrystalline HgI2.

Authors:  Hong Du; Larry E Antonuk; Youcef El-Mohri; Qihua Zhao; Zhong Su; Jin Yamamoto; Yi Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Reduction of radiation dose for cerebral angiography using flat panel detector of direct conversion type: a vascular phantom study.

Authors:  Y Hatakeyama; S Kakeda; N Ohnari; J Moriya; N Oda; K Nishino; W Miyamoto; Y Korogi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  A practical exposure-equivalent metric for instrumentation noise in x-ray imaging systems.

Authors:  G K Yadava; A T Kuhls-Gilcrist; S Rudin; V K Patel; K R Hoffmann; D R Bednarek
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Progress in electron-multiplying CCD (EMCCD) based, high-resolution, high-sensitivity x-ray detector for fluoroscopy and radiography.

Authors:  Andrew T Kuhls; Girijesh Yadava; Vikas Patel; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2007

Review 10.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.