Literature DB >> 10352606

Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique.

C D Marcus1, V J Ladam-Marcus, J L Bigot, C Clement, B Baehrel, B P Menanteau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether computed tomographic (CT) angiography with the volume-rendering technique (VRT) can be used to accurately quantify carotid arterial stenosis and to identify occlusions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT was performed in 23 patients who were referred for carotid stenosis evaluation. VRT images and shaded-surface display (SSD) images of 46 carotid arterial bifurcations were compared with findings from digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
RESULTS: Agreement on stenosis category between VRT CT angiography and DSA was found in 39 (85%) of the 46 carotid arteries studied. VRT CT angiography was 92% (49 of 53) sensitive and 96% (82 of 85) specific for the detection of grade 2-3 stenoses (> or = 70% stenosis). Agreement on stenosis category between SSD CT angiography and DSA was found in 38 (83%) of the 46 carotid arteries studied. SSD CT angiography was 91% (48 of 53) sensitive and 93% (79 of 85) specific for the detection of grade 2-3 stenoses. Calcified stenoses were correctly graded at VRT CT angiography in 10 of the 10 cases with heavy mural calcified plaques, while eight of the 10 stenoses were accurately quantified at SSD CT angiography.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that VRT CT angiography is as accurate as SSD CT angiography in the evaluation of carotid arterial bifurcations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10352606     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn42775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic patients: comparison with rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Marja Berg; Zishu Zhang; Aki Ikonen; Petri Sipola; Reetta Kälviäinen; Hannu Manninen; Ritva Vanninen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Semi-automated computer assessment of the degree of carotid artery stenosis compares favorably to visual evaluation.

Authors:  Max Wintermark; Christine Glastonbury; Elizabeth Tong; Benison C Lau; Sarah Schaeffer; Jeffrey D Chien; Peter J Haar; David Saloner
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.181

4.  Multislice CT angiography.

Authors:  U Joseph Schoepf; Christoph R Becker; Lars K Hofmann; Marco Das; Thomas Flohr; Bernd M Ohnesorge; Bernhard Baumert; Joshua Rolnick; Jean M Allen; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Assessment of intracranial arterial stenosis with multidetector row CT angiography: a postprocessing techniques comparison.

Authors:  L Saba; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; G Mallarini
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Impact of Multidetector CT on 3D CT Angiography.

Authors:  I K Indrajit; J D Souza; V S Bedi; R Pant
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

7.  Carotid artery calcification on CT may independently predict stroke risk.

Authors:  Kiran R Nandalur; Erol Baskurt; Klaus D Hagspiel; Michael Finch; C Douglas Phillips; Sirisha R Bollampally; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  3D digital subtraction angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of flat panel detector with conventional image intensifier TV system using a vascular phantom.

Authors:  S Kakeda; Y Korogi; N Ohnari; Y Hatakeyama; J Moriya; N Oda; K Nishino; W Miyamoto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Carotid artery stenosis: reproducibility of automated 3D CT angiography analysis method.

Authors:  Zishu Zhang; Marja H Berg; Aki E J Ikonen; Ritva L Vanninen; Hannu I Manninen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Efficacy and sensitivity of axial scans and different reconstruction methods in the study of the ulcerated carotid plaque using multidetector-row CT angiography: comparison with surgical results.

Authors:  L Saba; G Caddeo; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; G Mallarini
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.825

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.