Literature DB >> 19132496

Ultra-low-dose computed tomography system with a flat panel detector: assessment of radiation dose reduction and spatial and low contrast resolution.

Yukihiro Nagatani1, Norihisa Nitta, Masashi Takahashi, Noriaki Tezuka, Yasutaka Nakano, Mitsuru Ikeda, Yuki Kirino, Keiji Hashimoto, Hideji Otani, Yoko Murakami, Kiyoshi Murata.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to introduce a prototype cone-beam computed tomography system equipped with a flat panel detector (FPD-CT system) and measure its radiation dose and spatial and lowcontrast resolution.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A patient was rotated in a sitting position, and cone beam data were acquired with the flat panel detector from a fixed X-ray tube. Absorbed dose, spatial and low-contrast resolution, and variation in the CT attenuation value were assessed quantitatively in the acrylic phantom. The visibility of normal blood vessels in clinical images of seven patients was analyzed qualitatively by five board-certified radiologists. These quantitative and qualitative data were compared between the FPD-CT system and multidetector row CT (MDCT).
RESULTS: Minimal low-contrast sensitivity and a moderate spatial resolution were demonstrated in images of central lung fields acquired by FPD-CT. The absorbed dose in the FPD-CT system decreased to approximately 2.5% of the dose in the MDCT system.
CONCLUSION: Considering crossover structures in normal blood vessels and bronchi in the central areas of lung fields, this result implies that fairly acceptable spatial resolution can be realized with FPD-CT for detection and frequent follow-up of pulmonary abnormalities in the central lung fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19132496     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-008-0285-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Med        ISSN: 0288-2043


  18 in total

Review 1.  Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics.

Authors:  H G Chotas; J T Dobbins; C E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Three-dimensional analysis of left ventricle regional wall motion by using gated blood pool tomography.

Authors:  Véronique Eder; François Bernis; Marc Drumm; M I Diarra; Françoise Baulieu; Christophe Léger
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 3.  Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Thomas C Gerber; Ronald S Kuzo; Richard L Morin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material.

Authors:  K Honda; T A Larheim; K Maruhashi; K Matsumoto; K Iwai
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization.

Authors:  Rajiv Gupta; Michael Grasruck; Christoph Suess; Soenke H Bartling; Bernhard Schmidt; Karl Stierstorfer; Stefan Popescu; Tom Brady; Thomas Flohr
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.

Authors:  Michael Strotzer; Markus Völk; Rüdiger Fründ; Okka Hamer; Niels Zorger; Stefan Feuerbach
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; Thomas E Hartman; David E Midthun; Jeff A Sloan; Anne-Marie Sykes; Gregory L Aughenbaugh; Medy A Clemens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  3D digital subtraction angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of flat panel detector with conventional image intensifier TV system using a vascular phantom.

Authors:  S Kakeda; Y Korogi; N Ohnari; Y Hatakeyama; J Moriya; N Oda; K Nishino; W Miyamoto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Patient dose estimation for multi-detector-row CT examinations.

Authors:  Kanae Nishizawa; Shin-Ichiro Mori; Mari Ohno; Noriyuki Yanagawa; Takashi Yoshida; Keiichi Akahane; Kazuo Iwai; Shin-Ichi Wada
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans.

Authors:  Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; David P Naidich; Dorothy I McCauley; Georgeann McGuinness; Daniel M Libby; James P Smith; Mark W Pasmantier; Olli S Miettinen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.