Literature DB >> 17490657

A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates.

Ginny L Ryan1, Amy E T Sparks, Christopher S Sipe, Craig H Syrop, Anuja Dokras, Bradley J Van Voorhis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To reduce the twin rate in our IVF program.
DESIGN: A prospective educational study of infertile couples; a retrospective review of IVF outcomes before vs. after mandatory single embryo transfer (mSBT) policy change.
SETTING: University-based infertility center. PATIENT(S): One hundred ten of 120 consecutive new infertile couples completed the educational study. Outcomes of all embryo transfers (n = 693) performed 17 months before and 17 months after mSBT were evaluated. INTERVENTION(S): A 1-page educational summary of comparative risks of twins vs. singletons to maternal and child health. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Knowledge of twin risks and desired number of embryos transferred before and after education. Pregnancy rates, number of embryos transferred, and multiple-gestation rates before and after mSBT policy. RESULT(S): After education, knowledge of twin risks improved and a significant number of subjects changed their desired outcome to a lower gestational number. There was no change in ongoing pregnancy rates with blastocyst transfer before and after mSBT (63% vs. 58%; NS). Program-wide number of embryos transferred (2.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.9 +/- 0.7) and multiple-gestation rates (35% vs. 19%) decreased significantly while pregnancy rates were maintained. CONCLUSION(S): Simple educational materials can improve knowledge of twin pregnancy risks and affect decision making. In high-risk patients, mSBT results in pregnancy rates similar to two-blastocyst transfer, with decreased twin rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17490657     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  33 in total

Review 1.  Counseling and consenting women with cancer on their oncofertility options: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Emily S Jungheim; Kenneth R Carson; Douglas Brown
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2010

2.  Comparing patients' and clinicians' perceptions of elective single embryo transfer using the attitudes to a twin IVF pregnancy scale (ATIPS).

Authors:  Vibha Rai; Amanda Betsworth; Charlotte Beer; George Ndukwe; Cris Glazebrook
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Public health implications of a North American publicly funded in vitro fertilization program; lessons to learn.

Authors:  Talya Shaulov; Serge Belisle; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Double trouble: should double embryo transfer be banned?

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; G Owen Schaefer; Kelton Tremellen; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2015-04

5.  Patient selection criteria for blastocyst transfers in extended embryo culture programs.

Authors:  Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Rogério Bonassi Machado; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Is guided, targeted information about the risks of twin pregnancy able to increase the acceptance of single embryo transfer among IVF couples? A prospective study.

Authors:  Martina Masciovecchio; Carlotta Scarafia; Alessandra Razzano; Stefano Canosa; Gianluca Gennarelli; Andrea Roberto Carosso; Chiara Benedetto; Alberto Revelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Supernumerary blastocyst cryopreservation: a key prognostic indicator for patients opting for an elective single blastocyst transfer (eSBT).

Authors:  Christine Mullin; Alan S Berkeley; Jamie A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  The simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  Ryan J Heitmann; Micah J Hill; Kevin S Richter; Alan H DeCherney; Eric A Widra
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Aaron K Styer; Barbara Luke; Wendy Vitek; Mindy S Christianson; Valerie L Baker; Alicia Y Christy; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Protein expression in human cumulus cells as an indicator of blastocyst formation and pregnancy success.

Authors:  Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda Souza Setti; Edson Guimarães Lo Turco; Fernanda Bertuccez Cordeiro; Elaine Cristina Cabral; Sylvia Sanches Cortezzi; Erika Ono; Rita Cássia Sávio Figueira; Marcos Nogueira Eberlin; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.