Literature DB >> 17486376

Positive and negative prognostic variables for patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic breast disease.

Daniel M Sciubba1, Ziya L Gokaslan, Ian Suk, Dima Suki, Marcos V C Maldaun, Ian E McCutcheon, Remi Nader, Richard Theriault, Laurence D Rhines, Joseph A Shehadi.   

Abstract

The histology of the primary tumor in metastatic spine disease plays an important role in its treatment and prognosis. However, there is paucity in the literature of histology-specific analysis of spinal metastases. In this study, prognostic variables were reviewed for patients who underwent surgery for breast metastases to the spinal column. Respective chart review was done to first identify all patients with breast cancer over an 8-year period at a major cancer center and then to select all those with symptomatic metastatic disease to the spine who underwent spinal surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess several prognostic variables. Presence of visceral metastases, multiplicity of bony lesions, presence of estrogen receptors (ER), and segment of spine (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, sacral) in which metastases arose were compared with patient survival. Eighty-seven patients underwent 125 spinal surgeries. Those with estrogen receptor (ER) positivity had a longer median survival after surgery compared to those with estrogen receptor negativity. Patients with cervical location of metastasis had a shorter median survival compared with those having metastases in other areas of the spine. The presence of visceral metastases or a multiplicity of bony lesions did not have prognostic value. In patients with spinal metastases from breast cancer, aggressive surgical management may be an option for providing significant pain relief and preservation/improvement of neurological function. Interestingly, in patients undergoing such surgery, cervical location of metastasis is a negative prognostic variable, and ER-positivity is associated with better survival, while presence of visceral or multiple bony lesions does not significantly alter survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17486376      PMCID: PMC2078314          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0380-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  52 in total

1.  [Neurological outcome of 152 surgical patients with spinal metastasis].

Authors:  D Sinardet; A Chabane; T Khalil; E Seigneuret; F Sankari; J J Lemaire; J Chazal; B Irthum
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 2.  The diagnosis and treatment of metastatic spinal tumor.

Authors:  M H Bilsky; E Lis; J Raizer; H Lee; P Boland
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  1999

3.  Anterior reconstructive spinal surgery with Zielke instrumentation for metastatic malignancies of the spine.

Authors:  L H Chen; W J Chen; C C Niu; C H Shih
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiromi Matsuzaki; Hiroshi Oda; Masashi Oshima; Junnosuke Ryu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Surgical strategy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  K Tomita; N Kawahara; T Kobayashi; A Yoshida; H Murakami; T Akamaru
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The surgical treatment of metastatic disease of the spine.

Authors:  N C Hatrick; J D Lucas; A R Timothy; M A Smith
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Postoperative outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  B Weigel; M Maghsudi; C Neumann; R Kretschmer; F J Müller; M Nerlich
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Surgery in spinal metastasis without spinal cord compression: indications and strategy related to the risk of recurrence.

Authors:  H Chataigner; M Onimus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Coaxial double-lumen methylmethacrylate reconstruction in the anterior cervical and upper thoracic spine after tumor resection.

Authors:  D J Miller; F F Lang; G L Walsh; D Abi-Said; D M Wildrick; Z L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Early response of breast cancer bone metastases to chemotherapy evaluated with MR imaging.

Authors:  I Ciray; H Lindman; K G Aström; J Bergh; K H Ahlström
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  25 in total

1.  The timing of surgical intervention in the treatment of complete motor paralysis in patients with spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Xi Zhou; Hai Wang; Pengxiang Jiang; Siyi Cai; Jianguo Zhang; Yong Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prolonged survival following aggressive treatment for metastatic breast cancer in the spine.

Authors:  Patricia L Zadnik; Lee Hwang; Derek G Ju; Mari L Groves; Jackson Sui; Alp Yurter; Timothy F Witham; Ali Bydon; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 3.  A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Minimally invasive versus conventional spine surgery for vertebral metastases: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Zach Pennington; A Karim Ahmed; Camilo A Molina; Jeffrey Ehresman; Ilya Laufer; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

5.  Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Posterolateral cervical transpedicular corpectomy for the surgical management of metastatic tumor" by M.H. Pham et al. (Eur Spine J; 2018: DOI 10.1007/s00586-018-5466-7).

Authors:  Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Severe persistent coronal imbalance following instrumented posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jason B Anari; Scott M LaValva; John M Flynn; Aaron M Tatad
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-06-04

Review 7.  Diagnosis and surgical management of breast cancer metastatic to the spine.

Authors:  Derek G Ju; Alp Yurter; Ziya L Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

8.  Molecular phenotype is associated with survival in breast cancer patients with spinal bone metastases.

Authors:  L Bollen; C Wibmer; M Wang; Y M van der Linden; A Leithner; C E Bünger; A B Jensen; M Fiocco; G Bratschitsch; W Pondaag; J V M G Bovée; P D S Dijkstra
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Andreas Leithner; Roman Radl; Gerald Gruber; Markus Hochegger; Katharina Leithner; Heike Welkerling; Peter Rehak; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  [Metastatic breast cancer in the spine : Molecular predictors for choosing adequate treatment strategies].

Authors:  D Adler; M Kriegsmann; P Sinn; A Schneeweiss; H Almansour; B Lehner; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.