Literature DB >> 10562991

Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Postoperative outcome and quality of life.

B Weigel1, M Maghsudi, C Neumann, R Kretschmer, F J Müller, M Nerlich.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Eighty-six surgical interventions in 76 consecutive patients with symptomatic spinal metastases were reviewed retrospectively.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the postoperative outcome and quality of life of patients surgically treated for symptomatic spinal metastases. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The standard surgical treatment for patients with symptomatic spinal metastases is anterior spinal cord decompression with stabilization. However, because therapy is only palliative, satisfactory quality of life and high patient acceptance are essential.
METHODS: The medical records of all patients were reviewed retrospectively. Furthermore, all surviving patients or the next of kin of deceased patients were interviewed by telephone, and the family doctors or the care-providing physicians of external institutions were contacted.
RESULTS: First-choice surgical treatment was anterior spinal cord decompression with stabilization. Postoperative mean survival was 13.1 months, and mean time at home after spinal surgery was 11.1 months. Neurologic improvement with regard to Frankel classification was observed in 58% of the patients, and 93% were able to walk postoperatively. Pain relief was noted in 89%. Overall, 67% of the patients achieved moderate or good general health as shown by the Karnofsky Index, and 80% were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgical intervention. Moreover, 19% of the surgical interventions were associated with complications, local tumor recurrence developed in 22% of the patients, and paraplegia ultimately developed in 18% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases, in particular anterior decompression, is of benefit in most metastatic lesions in terms of satisfactory postoperative outcome and quality of life. However, in patients with melanoma or lung carcinoma, the authors advocate spinal surgery only in very exceptional cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10562991     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199911010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  62 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines: breast cancer pain.

Authors:  Marcel Dvorak; Charles G Fisher
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-07-09       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  A meta-analysis of surgery versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic spinal epidural disease.

Authors:  Paul Klimo; Clinton J Thompson; John R W Kestle; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Interdisciplinary clinical evaluation of 58 patients with lumbar-vertebral metastases from cervico-uterine cancer.

Authors:  Víctor Valdespino Gómez; Juan M Salgado Cazares; Gaspar González Astudillo; Víctor E Valdespino Castillo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  En bloc spondylectomy reconstructions in a biomechanical in-vitro study.

Authors:  A C Disch; K D Schaser; I Melcher; A Luzzati; F Feraboli; W Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Prognosis scores for spinal metastases].

Authors:  N H von der Höh; J Gulow; S K Tschöke; A Völker; C E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Minimal-invasive stabilization and circumferential spinal cord decompression in metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC).

Authors:  Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; Reginald Knight; Jörg Beyerlein; Roland Gessler; Lothar Wiesner; Christian Schaefer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Minimally invasive versus conventional spine surgery for vertebral metastases: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Zach Pennington; A Karim Ahmed; Camilo A Molina; Jeffrey Ehresman; Ilya Laufer; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

Review 8.  Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group.

Authors:  David Choi; A Crockard; C Bunger; J Harms; N Kawahara; C Mazel; R Melcher; K Tomita
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Clinical outcome of posterior fixation surgery in patients with vertebral metastasis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Igarashi; Keigo Okamoto; Koji Teramoto; Ryosuke Kaku; Keiko Ishida; Keiko Ueda; Yo Kawaguchi; Tetsuo Hori; Masayuki Hashimoto; Shoji Kitamura; Noriaki Tezuka; Jun Hanaoka
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-17

10.  Surgical treatment of cauda equina compression as a result of metastatic tumours of the lumbo-sacral junction and sacrum.

Authors:  Nasir A Quraishi; K E Giannoulis; S R Manoharan; K L Edwards; B M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.